ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018
Hydroxychloroquine prescription trends and predictors for excess dosing per recent ophthalmology guidelines.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel electroretinography devices to detect hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- How toxic is an old friend? A review of the safety of hydroxychloroquine in clinical practice.Internal medicine journal · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the prophylactic effect of hydroxychloroquine on people in close-contact with patients with COVID-19.Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021Article
- Adherence to Weight-Based Dosing Guidelines in Patients Receiving Hydroxychloroquine for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Quality Improvement Initiative.ACR open rheumatology · 2021Article
- Hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: therapeutic promises, current status, and environmental implications.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
- An objective method of diagnosing hydroxychloroquine maculopathy.Eye (London, England) · 2021Article
- Diagnostic approaches and potential therapeutic options for coronavirus disease 2019.New microbes and new infections · 2020Review
- Quantitative Fundus Autofluorescence in Systemic Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine Therapy.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Evolutionary Adaptation toward Host Entry and Recognition of Receptor O-Acetyl Sialylation in Virus-Host Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Drug Development and Medicinal Chemistry Efforts toward SARS-Coronavirus and Covid-19 Therapeutics.ChemMedChem · 2020Review
- Guide for Nuclear Medicine Applications During the COVID-19 Outbreak.Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2020Article
- Aminoquinolines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2020Article
- Available Compounds With Therapeutic Potential Against COVID-19: Antimicrobial Therapies, Supportive Care, and Probable Vaccines.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Update on the treatment and outcome of systemic lupus erythematous in children.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2019Review
- Hydroxychloroquine retinopathy - implications of research advances for rheumatology care.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHydroxychloroquine (HCQ) retinopathy may be more common than previously recognized; recent ophthalmology guidelines have revised recommendations from ideal body weight (IBW)-based dosing to actual body weight (ABW)-based dosing. However, contemporary HCQ prescribing trends in the UK remain unknown.
methodsWe examined a UK general population database to investigate HCQ dosing between 2007 and 2016. We studied trends of excess HCQ dosing per ophthalmology guidelines (defined by exceeding 6.5 mg/kg of IBW and 5.0 mg/kg of ABW) and determined their independent predictors using multivariable logistic regression analyses.
resultsAmong 20,933 new HCQ users (78% female), the proportions of initial HCQ excess dosing declined from 40% to 36% using IBW and 38% to 30% using ABW, between 2007 and 2016. Among these, 47% of women were excess-dosed (multivariable OR 12.52; 95% CI 10.99-14.26) using IBW and 38% (multivariable OR 1.98; 95% CI,1.81-2.15) using ABW. Applying IBW, 37% of normal and 44% of obese patients were excess-dosed; however, applying ABW, 53% of normal and 10% of obese patients were excess-dosed (multivariable ORs = 1.61 and 0.1 (reference = normal); both p < 0.01). Long-term HCQ users showed similar excess dosing.
conclusionA substantial proportion of HCQ users in the UK, particularly women, may have excess HCQ dosing per the previous or recent weight-based guidelines despite a modest decline in recent years. Over half of normal-BMI individuals were excess-dosed per the latest guidelines. This implies the potential need to reduce dosing for many patients but also calls for further research to establish unifying evidence-based safe and effective dosing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.