Trial reportBMC medicine2018
How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585892 (Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical thinking pedagogical practices in medical education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of video-based and presentation-based self-directed instruction for learning basic neuroangiography.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Choosing Wisely: Key Feature Examinations as a Powerful Approach to Foster Clinical Reasoning in Dental Education.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026Trial
- Effects of Elaboration and Instructor Feedback on Retention of Clinical Reasoning Competence Among Undergraduate Medical Students: A Randomized Crossover Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Face-to-face versus 360° VR video: a comparative study of two teaching methods in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Teaching and learning clinical reasoning skill in undergraduate medical students: A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Formative key feature examinations as innovative teaching approach in dental education: A project report.GMS journal for medical education · 2024Article
- Canadian medical student perceptions of the Choosing Wisely Canada campaign.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Article
- Teaching medical students to choose wisely through simulation.European journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Use of digital teaching resources and predictors of medical student performance during the pandemic: A prospective study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Use of 360° virtual reality video in medical obstetrical education: a quasi-experimental design.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Perception of health-related case studies in the context of introduction to clinical medicine course: students' and teachers' perspective.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.Journal of graduate medical education · 2019Article
- The Impact of Medical Students' Individual Teaching Format Choice on the Learning Outcome Related to Clinical Reasoning.JMIR medical education · 2019Article
- The Case of Ty Jackson: An Interactive Module on LGBT Health Employing Introspective Techniques and Video-Based Case Discussion.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2019Article
- Quality Principles of App Description Texts and Their Significance in Deciding to Use Health Apps as Assessed by Medical Students: Survey Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Training of clinical reasoning with a Serious Game versus small-group problem-based learning: A prospective study.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome.
methodsIn a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam.
resultsOf 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk.
conclusionRepeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.