Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976211›Full record

Trial reportBMC medicine2018

How can we teach medical students to choose wisely? A randomised controlled cross-over study of video- versus text-based case scenarios.

Sascha Ludwig, Nikolai Schuelper, Jamie Brown, Sven Anders, Tobias Raupach

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05585892 (Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05585892 nacompletednot on this map

Randomised Cross-over Study on the Effectiveness of Elaboration and Proactive Feedback as Part of Formative Key Feature Examinations in Undergraduate Medical Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GoettingenRan2018 to 2019Enrolled143ConditionsMedical EducationArmsElaboration and individual mailed feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Choosing Wisely: Key Feature Examinations as a Powerful Approach to Foster Clinical Reasoning in Dental Education.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sascha LudwigDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Nikolai SchuelperDepartment of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Jamie BrownHealth Behaviour Research Centre, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Sven AndersDepartment of Legal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Butenfeld 34, D-22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Tobias RaupachDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, Göttingen University Medical Centre, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, D-37075, Göttingen, Germany. raupach@med.uni-goettingen.de.
University College London · GBUniversity of Göttingen · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22962Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Choosing Wisely campaign highlights the importance of clinical reasoning abilities for competent and reflective physicians. The principles of this campaign should be addressed in undergraduate medical education. Recent research suggests that answering questions on important steps in patient management promotes knowledge retention. It is less clear whether increasing the authenticity of educational material by the inclusion of videos further enhances learning outcome.

methodsIn a prospective randomised controlled cross-over study, we assessed whether repeated video-based testing is more effective than repeated text-based testing in training students to choose appropriate diagnostic tests, arrive at correct diagnoses and identify advisable therapies. Following an entry exam, fourth-year undergraduate medical students attended 10 weekly computer-based seminars during which they studied patient case histories. Each case contained five key feature questions (items) on the diagnosis and treatment of the presented patient. Students were randomly allocated to read text cases (control condition) or watch videos (intervention), and assignment to either text or video was switched between groups every week. Using a within-subjects design, student performance on video-based and text-based items was assessed 13 weeks (exit exam) and 9 months (retention test) after the first day of term. The primary outcome was the within-subject difference in performance on video-based and text-based items in the exit exam.

resultsOf 125 eligible students, 93 provided data for all three exams (response rate 74.4%). Percent scores were significantly higher for video-based than for text-based items in the exit exam (76.2 ± 19.4% vs. 72.4 ± 19.1%, p = 0.026) but not the retention test (69.2 ± 20.2% vs. 66.4 ± 20.3%, p = 0.108). An additional Bayesian analysis of this retention test suggested that video-based training is marginally more effective than text-based training in the long term (Bayes factor 2.36). Regardless of presentation format, student responses revealed a high prevalence of erroneous beliefs that, if applied to the clinical context, could place patients at risk.

conclusionRepeated video-based key feature testing produces superior short-term learning outcome compared to text-based testing. Given the high prevalence of misconceptions, efforts to improve clinical reasoning training in medical education are warranted. The Choosing Wisely campaign lends itself to being part of this process.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceCross-Over StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesStudents, MedicalChoosing wiselyClinical reasoningMedical educationTest-enhanced learningVideo

Identifiers

PMID29976211
PMCPMC6034339
OpenAlexW2811457323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.