Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29976164›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Bulk tumour cell migration in lung carcinomas might be more common than epithelial-mesenchymal transition and be differently regulated.

Martin Zacharias, Luka Brcic, Sylvia Eidenhammer, Helmut Popper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The LncRNA DUXAP10 Could Function as a Promising Oncogene in Human Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin ZachariasDiagnostic and Research Center, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, Graz, 8036, Austria.
Luka BrcicDiagnostic and Research Center, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, Graz, 8036, Austria.
Sylvia EidenhammerDiagnostic and Research Center, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, Graz, 8036, Austria.
Helmut PopperDiagnostic and Research Center, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstraße 6, Graz, 8036, Austria. helmut.popper@medunigraz.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4970-1265
Medical University of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is one mechanism of carcinoma migration, while complex tumour migration or bulk migration is another - best demontrated by tumour cells invading blood vessels.

methodsThirty cases of non-small cell lung carcinomas were used for identifying genes responsible for bulk cell migration, 232 squamous cell and adenocarcinomas to identify bulk migration rates. Genes expressed differently in the primary tumour and in the invasion front were regarded as relevant in migration and further validated in 528 NSCLC cases represented on tissue microarrays (TMAs) and metastasis TMAs.

resultsMarkers relevant for bulk cancer cell migration were regulated differently when compared with EMT: Twist expressed in primary tumour, invasion front, and metastasis was not associated with TGFβ1 and canonical Wnt, as Slug, Snail, and Smads were negative and β-Catenin expressed membraneously. In the majority of tumours, E-Cadherin was downregulated at the invasive front, but not absent, but, coexpressed with N-Cadherin. Vimentin was coexpressed with cytokeratins at the invasion site in few cases, whereas fascin expression was seen in a majority. Expression of ERK1/2 was downregulated, PLCγ was only expressed at the invasive front and in metastasis. Brk and Mad, genes identified in Drosophila border cell migration, might be important for bulk migration and metastasis, together with invadipodia proteins Tks5 and Rab40B, which were only upregulated at the invasive front and in metastasis. CXCR1 was expressed equally in all carcinomas, as opposed to CXCR2 and 4, which were only expressed in few tumours.

conclusionBulk cancer cell migration seems predominant in AC and SCC. Twist, vimentin, fascin, Mad, Brk, Tsk5, Rab40B, ERK1/2 and PLCγ are associated with bulk cancer cell migration. This type of migration requires an orchestrated activation of proteins to keep the cells bound to each other and to coordinate movement. This hypothesis needs to be proven experimentally.

Indexed as

Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionAdenocarcinomaCadherinsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell MovementExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisPhospholipase C gammaReceptors, Interleukin-8ACadherinsExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesPhospholipase C gammaReceptors, Interleukin-8AAdenocarcinomaBulk migrationCadherinLung cancerMadProtein expressionSquamous cell carcinomaTks5Twist

Identifiers

PMID29976164
PMCPMC6034257
OpenAlexW2865687058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.