Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29975681›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

COBRAme: A computational framework for genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression.

Colton J Lloyd, Ali Ebrahim, Laurence Yang, Zachary A King, Edward Catoiu, Edward J O'Brien, Joanne K Liu, Bernhard O Palsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A systems-level atlas of carbon-response transcriptional states inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Aerobicity stimulon iniScience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Constraint-Based Metabolic Modeling Approach for Microbial Communities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Predicting Strain-Specific Metabolic Capabilities in the GenusComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integration of proteomic data with genome-scale metabolic models: A methodological overview.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Colton J LloydDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6556-6345
Ali EbrahimDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Laurence YangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-7643
Zachary A KingDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Edward CatoiuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Edward J O'BrienBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Joanne K LiuBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9973-524X
Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-6785

Funding

Multiscale Molecular Systems Biology: Reconstruction and Model OptimizationU01GM102098 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAUNDERS, MICHAEL ALAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM102098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-scale models of metabolism and macromolecular expression (ME-models) explicitly compute the optimal proteome composition of a growing cell. ME-models expand upon the well-established genome-scale models of metabolism (M-models), and they enable a new fundamental understanding of cellular growth. ME-models have increased predictive capabilities and accuracy due to their inclusion of the biosynthetic costs for the machinery of life, but they come with a significant increase in model size and complexity. This challenge results in models which are both difficult to compute and challenging to understand conceptually. As a result, ME-models exist for only two organisms (Escherichia coli and Thermotoga maritima) and are still used by relatively few researchers. To address these challenges, we have developed a new software framework called COBRAme for building and simulating ME-models. It is coded in Python and built on COBRApy, a popular platform for using M-models. COBRAme streamlines computation and analysis of ME-models. It provides tools to simplify constructing and editing ME-models to enable ME-model reconstructions for new organisms. We used COBRAme to reconstruct a condensed E. coli ME-model called iJL1678b-ME. This reformulated model gives functionally identical solutions to previous E. coli ME-models while using 1/6 the number of free variables and solving in less than 10 minutes, a marked improvement over the 6 hour solve time of previous ME-model formulations. Errors in previous ME-models were also corrected leading to 52 additional genes that must be expressed in iJL1678b-ME to grow aerobically in glucose minimal in silico media. This manuscript outlines the architecture of COBRAme and demonstrates how ME-models can be created, modified, and shared most efficiently using the new software framework.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationGene ExpressionModels, GeneticSoftware DesignAlgorithmsGenomeMetabolism

Identifiers

PMID29975681
PMCPMC6049947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.