ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2018
Antioxidant defense capacity of ovarian tissue after vitrification in a metal closed system.
Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to assess antioxidant activity? Advances, limitations, and applications of in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo approaches.Food production, processing and nutrition · 2025Review
- Static magnetic field assisted thawing improves cryopreservation of mouse whole ovaries.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review on reactive oxygen species generation and antioxidant therapy.Cell and tissue research · 2023Review
- Morphological study on the effects of sample size on ovarian tissue vitrification.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2022Article
- Detailed Morphological Analysis of Cryoinjury in Human Ovarian Tissue Following Vitrification or Slow Freezing.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2022Article
- Comparison between two cryopreservation techniques of human ovarian cortex: morphological aspects and the heat shock response (HSR).Cell stress & chaperones · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe present study analyzed the quality of bovine ovarian tissue after vitrification in a metal closed chamber, in terms of putative changes in tissue viability (lactate dehydrogenase -LDH- release), anti-oxidant defenses, and redox parameters caused by cryopreservation.
methodsSmall and large fragmented bovine ovarian tissue specimens were vitrified in a metal chamber. After rewarming, tissue samples were fixed or cultured for 48 hours. Glutathione (GSH), protein sulfhydryl content, Total Radical Trapping Antioxidant Potential (TRAP), and lactate dehydrogenase were analyzed immediately after rewarming and after tissue culture.
resultsNo changes in antioxidant parameters or viability of rewarmed tissue samples were found immediately or 48h after vitrification. The method of vitrification in a metal closed chamber used in this study preserved the quality of bovine ovarian tissue. Furthermore, our data showed that the size of the tissue specimens did not affect post-vitrification biochemical viability parameters.
conclusionsWe believe that the vitrification methodology employed in the present study is safe and effective, and should be evaluated for use in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.