Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29975417›Full record

Observational studyCancer2018

Patient factors associated with sperm cryopreservation among at-risk adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer.

James L Klosky, Vicky Lehmann, Jessica S Flynn, Yin Su, Hui Zhang, Kathryn M Russell, Lauren A M Schenck, Leslie R Schover

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-efficacy in symptom management for adolescents and young adults with cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James L KloskyThe Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vicky LehmannDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0003-4898-3176
Jessica S FlynnDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.ORCID 0000-0002-5020-4701
Yin SuDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Kathryn M RussellDepartment of Psychology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Lauren A M SchenckDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Leslie R SchoverDepartment of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas (retired).ORCID 0000-0001-7225-987X
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USEmory University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
Predictors of Adolescent Sperm Banking: Development of a Profiling and Referral TR21HD061296 · NICHD · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI KLOSKY, JAMES · 2010 to 2011
$455k
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE LUNG PGDHR01HD021765 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OKITA, RICHARD T. · 1988 to 1991
–
American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development CA-21765National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health HD061296NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD061296St. Jude Children's Research Hospital ALSAC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough survivors of adolescent-onset cancers are at risk of infertility, the majority desire children. Fertility preservation options are available for adolescents, but sperm banking remains underused. To the authors' knowledge, patient factors that influence decisions to bank sperm are poorly understood.

methodsA cross-sectional study of 146 adolescent males who were newly diagnosed with cancer and who completed surveys within 1 week of treatment initiation was performed. Participants, 65% of whom were white, were aged 13 to 21 years (mean, 16.49 years; standard deviation, 2.02 years) and were at risk of infertility secondary to impending gonadotoxic treatment. Participating institutions included 8 leading pediatric oncology centers across the United States and Canada.

resultsOf the patients approached, approximately 80.6% participated. Parent recommendation to bank (odds ratio [OR], 4.88; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.15-20.71 [P = .03]), higher Tanner stage (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.60-11.27 [P < .01]), greater perceived benefits (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.77 [P < .01]), and lower social barriers to banking (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96 [P < .01]) were found to be associated with adolescent collection attempts, whereas meeting with a fertility specialist (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.00-11.83 [P = .05]), parent (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.12-8.10 [P = .03]) or provider (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.05-6.77 [P = .04]) recommendation to bank, and greater adolescent self-efficacy to bank (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33 [P = .03]) were found to be associated with successful sperm banking.

conclusionsAdolescents' perceived benefits of sperm banking, higher Tanner stage, and parent recommendation were associated with collection attempts, whereas perceived social barriers decreased this likelihood. Successful banking was associated with greater adolescent self-efficacy, parent and provider recommendation to bank, and consultation with a fertility specialist. Providers should consult with both adolescents and parents regarding fertility preservation, and interventions should be tailored to address barriers to sperm banking while promoting its benefits.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCryopreservationFertility PreservationHealth BehaviorSpermatozoaAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAge of OnsetHumansInfertility, MaleMaleNeoplasmsRisk FactorsSemen PreservationSocioeconomic Factorsadolescentcryopreservationmale infertilityoncologypsychology

Identifiers

PMID29975417
PMCPMC6191330
OpenAlexW2819873962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.