Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29975150›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2018

Differentiating vacuum-assisted breast biopsy from core needle biopsy: Is it necessary?

Satoko Nakano, Yoshimi Imawari, Akemi Mibu, Masahiko Otsuka, Toshinori Oinuma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cell membrane-camouflaged liposomes for tumor cell-selective glycans engineering and imaging in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsies: Basic and New Techniques.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoko Nakano1 Department of Breast Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center , Kawaguchi , Japan.
Yoshimi Imawari1 Department of Breast Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center , Kawaguchi , Japan.
Akemi Mibu1 Department of Breast Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center , Kawaguchi , Japan.
Masahiko Otsuka2 Department of Surgery, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center , Kawaguchi , Japan.
Toshinori Oinuma3 Department of Pathology, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center , Kawaguchi , Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Needle biopsy has replaced excisional biopsy as a definitive diagnostic technique for breast tumours, although excisional biopsy is still used for complete tumour removal for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. Many vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB) systems have been made available by several manufacturers since the release of the Mammotome (MMT) by Johnson & Johnson in 1995. Several recent discussions have been conducted to identify whether core needle biopsy (CNB) or VAB, is more appropriate. However, currently available VAB systems differ from the conventional system (i.e. articulate arm type 11-gauge(G) MMT), and the characteristics of both CNB and VAB have been improved. In CNB, a 14-G needle is frequently used to obtain a larger sample. By contrast, VAB is considered easier to perform because it uses a thinner needle and a lighter, non-tethered system. When differentiating CNB from VAB, the type of VAB should also be defined. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of ultrasonography-guided VAB and CNB with a focus on practical issues such as the number of samples and volume of tissue obtained during ultrasonography-guided needle biopsy.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Large-Core NeedleBiopsy, NeedleBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyUltrasonographyVacuum

Identifiers

PMID29975150
PMCPMC6319844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.