Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29975113›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2018

Relief of the Dma1-mediated checkpoint requires Dma1 autoubiquitination and dynamic localization.

Christine M Jones, Jun-Song Chen, Alyssa E Johnson, Zachary C Elmore, Sierra N Cullati, Janel R Beckley, Kathleen L Gould

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christine M JonesDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Jun-Song ChenDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Alyssa E JohnsonDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Zachary C ElmoreDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Sierra N CullatiDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Janel R BeckleyDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Kathleen L GouldDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37240.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Integrated Biological Systems Training in OncologyT32CA119925 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Vivian Gama, William Patrick Tansey · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Checkpoint control of cytokinesisR01GM112989 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOULD, KATHLEEN L · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA119925NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosome segregation and cell division are coupled to prevent aneuploidy and cell death. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the septation initiation network (SIN) promotes cytokinesis, but upon mitotic checkpoint activation, the SIN is actively inhibited to prevent cytokinesis from occurring before chromosomes have safely segregated. SIN inhibition during the mitotic checkpoint is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Dma1. Dma1 binds to the CK1-phosphorylated SIN scaffold protein Sid4 at the spindle pole body (SPB), and ubiquitinates it. Sid4 ubiquitination antagonizes the SPB localization of the Pololike kinase Plo1, the major SIN activator, so that SIN signaling is delayed. How this checkpoint is silenced once spindle defects are resolved has not been clear. Here we establish that Dma1 transiently leaves SPBs during anaphase B due to extensive autoubiquitination. The SIN is required for Dma1 to return to SPBs later in anaphase. Blocking Dma1 removal from SPBs by permanently tethering it to Sid4 prevents SIN activation and cytokinesis. Therefore, controlling Dma1's SPB dynamics in anaphase is an essential step in S. pombe cell division and the silencing of the Dma1-dependent mitotic checkpoint.

Indexed as

AnaphaseCell Cycle ProteinsCytokinesisM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsPhosphorylationSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSignal TransductionSpindle ApparatusSpindle Pole BodiesUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCell Cycle ProteinsDma1 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID29975113
PMCPMC6249794
OpenAlexW2952087726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.