Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974571›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2018

Early medical abortion with self-administered low-dose mifepristone in combination with misoprostol.

Li-Ping Song, Shi-Yan Tang, Cui-Lan Li, Lee-Jaden-Gil-Yu-Kang Zhou, Xue-Tang Mo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Medical methods for first trimester abortion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li-Ping SongKey Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher-Education Institutes, Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shi-Yan TangKey Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher-Education Institutes, Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cui-Lan LiKey Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher-Education Institutes, Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9001-5841
Lee-Jaden-Gil-Yu-Kang ZhouGrade 10, Walt Whitman High School, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Xue-Tang MoKey Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher-Education Institutes, Guangzhou Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

Department of Scientific Research Centre's funding scheme 201610570030Scientific Research Centre's funding scheme 2014JDA028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of low-dose mifepristone combined with self-administered misoprostol for termination of early pregnancy.

methodsA total of 533 women seeking medical abortion in early pregnancy (≤49 days since the last menstrual period) were divided randomly into hospital- (H-Mis, 250) and self- (S-Mis, 283) administered misoprostol groups. Women in two groups took 100 mg of oral mifepristone in hospital followed by 200 μg of sublingual misoprostol 24 h later in hospital or home. The primary outcome parameter was complete abortion without surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were uterine bleeding, return of regular menses, side effects and patient acceptability.

resultsHigh rates of complete abortion were observed for both the H-Mis group (243/250; 94.8%) and the S-Mis group (266/283; 94.0%). No significant differences in outcomes (complete abortion/failure rates) or side effects were observed between the two groups. General satisfaction rates were similar for the two groups (H-Mis, 231/250, 92.4%; S-Mis, 263/283, 92.9%; P > 0.05). Higher convenience of administration (H-Mis, 211/250, 84.4%; S-Mis, 270/283, 95.4%; P < 0.05) and privacy protection (H-Mis, 214/250, 85.6%; S-Mis, 267/283, 94.3%; P < 0.05) satisfaction rates were obtained for the S-Mis group than for the H-Mis group.

conclusionSelf-administered sublingual misoprostol is as safe and effective as hospital-administered misoprostol following low-dose mifepristone to terminate early pregnancy (≤49 days of amenorrhoea) with fewer side effects.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAbortifacient AgentsAbortion, InducedAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMifepristoneMisoprostolSelf AdministrationYoung AdultAbortifacient AgentsMifepristoneMisoprostolearly medical abortionlow-dosemifepristone and misoprostolself-administration

Identifiers

PMID29974571
PMCPMC6175481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.