Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974407›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2018

Molecular Profiling Based on KRAS/BRAF Mutation, Methylation, and Microsatellite Statuses in Serrated Lesions.

Tamotsu Sugai, Makoto Eizuka, Yasuko Fujita, Keisuke Kawasaki, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Kazuyuki Ishida, Hiroo Yamano, Hiromu Suzuki, Takayuki Matsumoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Role ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of CDX2, MUC5AC, and p53 in the evaluation of the progression of serrated lesions toward colorectal carcinoma.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tamotsu SugaiDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan. tsugai@iwate-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4896-3557
Makoto EizukaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Yasuko FujitaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Keisuke KawasakiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Eiichiro YamamotoDepartment of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Cyuuouku, Sapporo, 060-0061, Japan.
Kazuyuki IshidaDepartment of Molecular Diagnostic Pathology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Hiroo YamanoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, 19-1, Cyuuouku, Sapporo, 060-0061, Japan.
Hiromu SuzukiDepartment of Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Cyuuouku, Sapporo, 060-0061, Japan.
Takayuki MatsumotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1, Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of your study is to characterize serrated lesions according to their molecular patterns, specifically BRAF/KRAS mutation, methylation, and microsatellite statuses. We evaluated the molecular patterns of 163 serrated lesions, including 37 microvesicular hyperplastic polyps, 73 sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps), 31 traditional serrated adenomas, and 22 SSA/Ps with cytological dysplasia/adenocarcinoma.

methodsMutations in BRAF (V600E)/KRAS (exon 2) and microsatellite status [microsatellite stability (MSS) vs. MSI] were examined using a pyrosequencer and the PCR-based microsatellite method, respectively. DNA methylation status was classified as low (LME), intermediate (IME), or high methylation epigenotype (HME) according to a PCR-based two-step method. In addition, mucin and annexin A10 expression was examined. Finally, we performed a hierarchical clustering analysis of the BRAF/KRAS mutation, DNA methylation, and microsatellite statuses.

resultsThe molecular patterns observed in the serrated lesions could be divided into five subgroups: lesions characterized by (1) BRAF mutation, HME, and MSI; (2) BRAF mutation, HME, and MSS; (3) BRAF mutation, LME/IME, and MSS; (4) no BRAF/KRAS mutations, LME/IME, and MSS; and (5) KRAS mutation, LME/IME, and MSS. In addition, we demonstrated that these observed molecular patterns help identify the associations of the molecular patterns and markers (i.e., mucin and annexin A10) with the clinicopathological findings, including histological features and histological diagnosis.

conclusionsWe suggest that the identified molecular patterns play an important role in the pathway of serrated lesion development.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenomaColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityAgedCarcinogenesisDNA MethylationFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAF protein, humanKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)BRAF mutationCluster analysisKRAS mutationMethylationMicrosatellite instabilitySerrated lesion

Identifiers

PMID29974407
PMCPMC6153566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.