Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974316›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical ecology2018

Pheromones Regulating Reproduction in Subsocial Beetles: Insights with References to Eusocial Insects.

Sandra Steiger, Johannes Stökl

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Offspring chemical control of adult reproductive transitions in a social insect.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The scent of offspring: chemical profiles of larvae change during development and affect parental behavior in a burying beetle.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra SteigerInstitute of Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, 35392, Gießen, Germany. sandra.steiger@agrar.uni-giessen.de.
Johannes StöklInstitute of Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Gießen, 35392, Gießen, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft STE 1874/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft STO 966/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beetles have evolved diverse strategies to cope with environmental challenges. Although parents of the vast majority of beetle species do not take care of their offspring, there are some species, in which parents provide elaborate post-hatching care and remain temporarily associated with their offspring to defend them from competitors or to provision them with food. Usually, socially induced reproductive "control" is a core feature of eusocial societies, but here we highlight that already in small family groups, socially induced reproductive regulation can play a fundamental role. By discussing the family life of burying beetles, we illustrate the mechanisms behind such a reproductive "control" and show that - similar to eusocial insects - pheromones can be an important regulating factor. However, apart from burying beetles, our knowledge of pheromones or other signals mediating reproductive regulation is surprisingly rudimentary for social beetles. More data are required to broaden our currently patchy picture.

Indexed as

AnimalsColeopteraLarvaOvipositionPheromonesReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalPheromonesAnti-aphrodisiacFamily lifeFertility signalJuvenile hormoneNicrophorusParental care

Identifiers

PMID29974316
OpenAlexW2810122379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.