Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974290›Full record

ReviewClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2018

Neurogenic hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.

Samuel J Mann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Marine drugs · 2018
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Beta-Blockers and Hypertension: Some Questions and Answers.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel J MannDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hypertension Center, New York-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, 424 East 70th St, New York, NY, 10021, USA. sjmann@med.cornell.edu.
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discussions about the cause and treatment of essential hypertension usually focus on mechanisms such as sodium/volume and the renin-angiotensin system. Less often discussed is hypertension driven by the sympathetic nervous system, i.e., neurogenic hypertension. In this review I discuss the pathophysiology of neurogenic hypertension, the controversy of renal versus central origin, the clinical clues that suggest neurogenic hypertension, and the interventions best suited in its treatment. Neurogenic hypertension is most likely to occur in patients with labile or paroxysmal hypertension, but evidence of increased sympathetic tone also suggests a neurogenic component in hypertension in patients with severe or resistant hypertension, chronic renal disease, comorbidities associated with increased sympathetic tone, and ingestion of drugs that stimulate sympathetic tone. The importance of combined alpha- and beta-blockade in pharmacologic treatment and the status of renal denervation are discussed. Although there is much that is unclear in its pathophysiology, recognition of neurogenic hypertension is of considerable clinical importance in individualizing drug therapy and achieving blood pressure control.

Indexed as

Autonomic Nervous System DiseasesHypertensionHumansAutonomic nervous systemBlood pressure variabilityLabile hypertensionParoxysmal hypertensionSympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID29974290
OpenAlexW2811391065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.