Trial reportAnnals of hematology2019
Multicenter phase 1/2 study of forodesine in patients with relapsed peripheral T cell lymphoma.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Japanese subgroup analysis in the Asian phase II study of darinaparsin in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2023Trial
- Antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab combined with apatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: An open-label, multicenter, phase II study.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Phase II study of E7777 in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory peripheral and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Cancer science · 2021Trial
- Novel agents and therapeutic advances in T cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Real-world treatment outcomes of peripheral T-cell lymphoma in the era of molecular targeted therapy.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2026Article
- Article
- Landscape of targets within nucleoside metabolism for the modification of immune responses.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Novel clinical risk stratification and treatment strategies in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024Review
- Improving gastrointestinal quality of life: romidepsin to tucidinostat in a case of angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Integrated Functions of Cardiac Energetics, Mechanics, and Purine Nucleotide Metabolism.Comprehensive Physiology · 2023Article
- Past, present and future therapeutic approaches in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Oral HDAC inhibitor tucidinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: phase IIb results.Haematologica · 2023Article
- Precise diagnosis and targeted therapy of nodal T-follicular helper cell lymphoma (T-FHCL).Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Purine nucleoside phosphorylase enables dual metabolic checkpoints that prevent T cell immunodeficiency and TLR7-associated autoimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Article
- Evaluation of prognosis following early disease progression in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.International journal of hematology · 2020Article
- SAMHD1 Limits the Efficacy of Forodesine in Leukemia by Protecting Cells against the Cytotoxicity of dGTP.Cell reports · 2020Article
- Successful Treatment of a Patient with Brentuximab Vedotin-Refractory ALK-Negative Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma with Romidepsin.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
21 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripheral T cell lymphomas are an aggressive group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with poor outcomes for most subtypes and no accepted standard of care for relapsed patients. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of forodesine, a novel purine nucleoside phosphorylase inhibitor, in patients with relapsed peripheral T cell lymphomas. Patients with histologically confirmed disease, progression after ≥ 1 prior treatment, and an objective response to last treatment received oral forodesine 300 mg twice-daily. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Forty-eight patients (median age, 69.5 years; median of 2 prior treatments) received forodesine. In phase 1 (n = 3 evaluable), no dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the first 28 days of forodesine treatment. In phase 2 (n = 41 evaluable), the ORR for the primary and final analyses was 22% (90% CI 12-35%) and 25% (90% CI 14-38%), respectively, including four complete responses (10%). Median PFS and OS were 1.9 and 15.6 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (96%), leukopenia (42%), and neutropenia (35%). Dose reduction and discontinuation due to adverse events were uncommon. Secondary B cell lymphoma developed in five patients, of whom four were positive for Epstein-Barr virus. In conclusion, forodesine has single-agent activity within the range of approved therapies in relapsed peripheral T cell lymphomas, with a manageable safety profile, and may represent a viable treatment option for this difficult-to-treat population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.