Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974216›Full record

SynthesisArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2018

Arthroscopic meniscal surgery versus conservative management in patients aged 40 years and older: a meta-analysis.

Dong-Yeong Lee, Young-Jin Park, Hyun-Jung Kim, Dae-Cheol Nam, Jin-Sung Park, Sang-Youn Song, Dong-Geun Kang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Successful treatment of degenerative medial meniscal tears in well-aligned knees with fibrin clot implantation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dong-Yeong LeeThe Armed Forces Daegu Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Young-Jin ParkGyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Jung KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Institute for Evidence-based Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Cheol NamGyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Sung ParkGyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Youn SongGyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jinju, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Geun KangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Samjeongja-ro 11, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, Republic of Korea. whatttary@gmail.com.
Gyeongsang National University Hospital · KRArmed Forces Capital Hospital · KRGyeongsang National University · KRKorea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe efficacy of arthroscopic meniscus surgery in old aged patients remains controversial. The purpose of the present study was to review published studies comparing arthroscopic meniscal surgery with conservative management to treat meniscal injuries in patients 40 years of age and older. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeveral electronic databases were queried for articles published until July 2017 that evaluated outcomes of arthroscopic meniscal surgery in patients aged 40 years and older. Data searches, extraction, analysis, and quality assessment were performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated using various outcome values. The results are presented as the standard mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsNine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes such as relief in knee pain (SMD = 0.01, 95% CIs = - 0.15 to 0.18, I

conclusionsThe efficacy of arthroscopic surgery was not superior to conservative management in this type of patients. Therefore, arthroscopic meniscal surgery should not be recommended as a first choice of treatment for degenerative meniscal tears. In patients over 40 years of age, arthroscopic surgery should be cautiously considered for degenerative meniscal tears and only when there has not been a satisfactory response to conservative management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthroscopyConservative TreatmentFemaleHumansMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionTibial Meniscus InjuriesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyConservative treatmentKnee jointMeniscusMeta-analysisMiddle aged

Identifiers

PMID29974216
OpenAlexW2810140196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.