Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974213›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2018

[Progressive muscle relaxation according to Jacobson for migraine prophylaxis : Clinical effectiveness and mode of action].

B Meyer, A Keller, B Müller, H-G Wöhlbier, P Kropp

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B MeyerInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland. bianca.meyer@med.uni-rostock.de.
A KellerInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
B MüllerInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
H-G WöhlbierInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
P KroppInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Gehlsheimer Straße 20, 18147, Rostock, Deutschland.
Universitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) after Jacobson has been used for migraine prophylaxis since the early 1970s. Migraine patients are assumed to have an enhanced autonomic arousal which can be counterbalanced by systematic relaxation. Relaxation techniques are thought to reduce the activation level, to alter cortical pain processing and to enhance activation in pain-reducing cortical structures in the periaqueductal grey matter. Meta-analyses could show PMR to be just as efficacious as pharmacological treatment options. A beneficial effect can only arise if regular daily exercises of 5-25 min are performed and the exercises are transferred into the daily routine. This review critically summarizes the empirical findings concerning the effects of PMR on migraine. A lack of recent research on this topic was determined. In a study by this group 50 migraine patients and 46 healthy controls were examined. It could be shown that in addition to the clinical efficacy on migraine frequency, changes in cortical information processing, measured by means of the evoked potential contingent negative variation (CNV) could also be determined. The initially increased CNV amplitude became normalized after regular PMR training in migraine patients. With the review of PMR studies on migraine prophylaxis and the results of our own study it could be shown that PMR is an efficacious non-pharmacological treatment option for migraine prophylaxis. In addition to its clinical effects, alterations in cortical stimulation processing in terms of a normalization of the CNV could be documented.

Indexed as

Autogenic TrainingMigraine DisordersContingent Negative VariationEvoked PotentialsHumansTreatment OutcomeContingent negative variationCortical information processingMigraineMigraine prophylaxisProgressive relaxation

Identifiers

PMID29974213
OpenAlexW2810197346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.