Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974211›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2018

Towards an individual screening strategy for first-degree relatives of celiac patients.

Margaretha M S Wessels, Nicky de Rooij, Lian Roovers, Jan Verhage, Willemien de Vries, M Luisa Mearin

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaretha M S WesselsDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands. mwessels@rijnstate.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-7130
Nicky de RooijDepartment of Pediatrics, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Lian RooversDepartment of Clinical Research, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Jan VerhageDepartment of Pediatrics, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Willemien de VriesDepartment of Pediatrics, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
M Luisa MearinDepartment of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rijnstate Hospital · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is known to be more prevalent in first-degree relatives of patients. In this retrospective cohort study of 609 relatives between 1994 and 2016, we investigated the effect of sex, HLA type, and age at time of index celiac diagnosis. Pearson's chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used as statistical analyses. CD screening was carried out for 427 relatives (70%), resulting in a prevalence of 15%. HLA typing in 335 relatives showed HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positivity in 87.5%. In 63% of children and all parents, celiac disease was diagnosed at first screening. It was diagnosed significantly more often in females, HLA-DQ2 homozygosity, and children (all p < 0.05). In children aged 0-1 year at time of index diagnosis, celiac disease was diagnosed after consecutive screening in 58%, after 3.9 ± 2.5 (max 10) years (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Future screening policies for relatives of celiac patients should include retesting, especially in HLA-positive relatives younger than 10 years of age. In addition, one-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients. What is Known: • Celiac disease is more prevalent in first-degree relatives of celiac patients (risk 3-12%). • HLA-DQ2 homozygous sisters/daughters are at highest risk (25%). What is New: • If younger than 10 years of age, repeated testing is necessary in HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive first-degree relatives when celiac disease is diagnosed in a family. • One-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCeliac DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFamilyFemaleHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMass ScreeningPrevalenceHLA AntigensCeliac diseasePersonalized medicineRiskScreening

Identifiers

PMID29974211
OpenAlexW2811037646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.