ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2018
Towards an individual screening strategy for first-degree relatives of celiac patients.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relevance of HLA-DQB1*02 Allele in the Genetic Predisposition of Children with Celiac Disease: Additional Cues from a Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Pooled it
- Second Screening for Celiac Disease in First-Degree Relatives of Pediatric Index Cases: A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- Clinical and Histopathological Profile of Adults with Celiac Disease at Diagnosis and on a Gluten-Free Diet: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Acceptability of screening for celiac disease at Youth Health Care Centers in The Netherlands.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Daily gluten consumption of pediatric first-degree relatives of coeliac patients, is it so low that we miss diagnoses?European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Celiac Disease Genetics, Pathogenesis, and Standard Therapy for Japanese Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Coeliac disease re-screening among once seronegative at-risk relatives: A long-term follow-up study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- The frequency of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 haplotypes and celiac disease among the first-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2021Article
- Celiac Disease Screening for High-Risk Groups: Are We Doing It Right?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2020Review
- Testing for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase in routine clinical practice: Requesting behaviour in relation to prevalence of positive results.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2020Review
- Pediatric Celiac Disease in Central and East Asia: Current Knowledge and Prevalence.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
- Individual screening strategy for pediatric celiac disease.European journal of pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is known to be more prevalent in first-degree relatives of patients. In this retrospective cohort study of 609 relatives between 1994 and 2016, we investigated the effect of sex, HLA type, and age at time of index celiac diagnosis. Pearson's chi-square test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used as statistical analyses. CD screening was carried out for 427 relatives (70%), resulting in a prevalence of 15%. HLA typing in 335 relatives showed HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positivity in 87.5%. In 63% of children and all parents, celiac disease was diagnosed at first screening. It was diagnosed significantly more often in females, HLA-DQ2 homozygosity, and children (all p < 0.05). In children aged 0-1 year at time of index diagnosis, celiac disease was diagnosed after consecutive screening in 58%, after 3.9 ± 2.5 (max 10) years (p < 0.001).Conclusion: Future screening policies for relatives of celiac patients should include retesting, especially in HLA-positive relatives younger than 10 years of age. In addition, one-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients. What is Known: • Celiac disease is more prevalent in first-degree relatives of celiac patients (risk 3-12%). • HLA-DQ2 homozygous sisters/daughters are at highest risk (25%). What is New: • If younger than 10 years of age, repeated testing is necessary in HLA-DQ2/DQ8-positive first-degree relatives when celiac disease is diagnosed in a family. • One-time celiac-specific antibody testing alone could be sufficient to rule out the disease in adolescent siblings and parents of newly diagnosed celiac patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.