ArticleArchives of basic and applied medicine2018
Patients' Perception of Quality of Diabetes Care Received in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Article in Archives of basic and applied medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is one of the diseases of public health concerns of the 21st century with rising burden in developing countries. The evaluation of care for diabetes from patients' perspective an important indicator of measuring quality of health services and improving treatment approaches but data of the nature are scarce in Nigeria. The study therefore investigated Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes care (PEQD) in Ibadan. This descriptive cross-sectional study recruited 384 diabetic patients from three hospitals where specialised services are offered in Ibadan. A semi-structured pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data. A 42-point PEQD questionnaire scale was used to collect data and a score of >21 was rated as good Perceived Quality of Care (PQC). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square test and logistic regression set at 5% level of statistical significance. Mean age of respondents was 62.5 + 10.8 years and mean diabetes duration was 8.4 + 7.6. Majority (58.3%) of the respondents didn't know the type of diabetes they had. Patients aged less than 60 years were less likely to PQC received as good (OR: 0.21; CI: 0.05 - 0.91) compared to those who were above 60 years. More than half (55.0%) of the respondents perceive quality of care as good. Patients' assessment of the quality of diabetes care received was perceived good. There is need to sustain current satisfactory services in diabetic care and institutionalize periodic survey patients' satisfaction to provide feedback for future quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29974057PMC6028040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.