Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29974039›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2018

Independent Heath Facility Meets Cancer Care Ontario and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Endoscopic Procedure Wait Times While Meeting Quality Indicators: A Retrospective Review.

Fraser Kegel, Niv Sne, Timothy Rice, Eric Joy, Shayan Shahsavar, Celeste A Collins, Maria Gagarine, Alexandra Allard-Coutu, Lisa Klotz, Angela Coates and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fraser KegelFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-9947
Niv SneFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy RiceFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eric JoyDivision of General Surgery and Trauma, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shayan ShahsavarFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Celeste A CollinsMichael G Degroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Maria GagarineUniversity of Ottawa, Canada.
Alexandra Allard-CoutuDivision of General Surgery and Trauma, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa KlotzFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Angela CoatesDivision of General Surgery and Trauma, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kamyar KahnamouiFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Marko SimunovicFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Canadian independent health facilities (IHFs) have been implemented to reduce hospital endoscopy volume and expedite endoscopic evaluations for patients suspected to have underlying colorectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of a prospective database at a large-volume urban IHF. The primary outcomes were wait times, and the secondary outcomes were colonoscopy quality indicators and complication rates. Results: Median wait times from referral to colonoscopy met the recommendations set out by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and Cancer Care Ontario for all indications: chronic abdominal pain: 43 days; new onset change in bowel habits: 36 days; bright red rectal bleeding: 42 days; documented iron-deficiency anemia: 43 days; fecal occult blood test positive: 38 days; cancer likely based on imaging or physical exam: 23 days; chronic diarrhea and chronic constipation: 42 days; and screening colonoscopies: 55 days. Secondary outcomes of quality indicators and complication rates all met or exceeded the CCO and CAG recommendations. Conclusions: This IHF met the recommended wait times for all indications for colonoscopy while maintaining high procedural quality and safety. IHFs are one solution to help meet the increasing demand for colonoscopy in Ontario.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicQuality Indicators, Health CareWaiting ListsAdultAgedCanadaCancer Care FacilitiesCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29974039
PMCPMC6008741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.