Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973965›Full record

ArticlePain research & management2018

Pleasant Pain Relief and Inhibitory Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Psychophysical Study.

Nathalie Bitar, Serge Marchand, Stéphane Potvin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research & management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie BitarCentre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Serge MarchandCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-5977
Stéphane PotvinCentre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-378X
Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec · CAUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Inhibitory conditioned pain modulation (ICPM) is one of the principal endogenous pain inhibition mechanisms and is triggered by strong nociceptive stimuli. Recently, it has been shown that feelings of pleasantness are experienced after the interruption of noxious stimuli. Given that pleasant stimuli have analgesic effects, it is therefore possible that the ICPM effect is explained by the confounding effect of pleasant pain relief. The current study sought to verify this assumption. Methods: Twenty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Thermal pain thresholds were measured using a Peltier thermode. ICPM was then measured by administering a tonic thermal stimulus before and after a cold-pressor test (CPT). Following the readministration of the CPT, pleasant pain relief was measured for 4 minutes. According to the opponent process theory, pleasant relief should be elicited following the interruption of a noxious stimulus. Results: The interruption of the CPT induced a Discussion: Results show that the cessation of a strong nociceptive stimulus elicits potent pleasant pain relief. The lack of correlation between ICPM and pleasant pain relief suggests that the ICPM effect, as measured by sequential paradigms, is unlikely to be fully explained by a pleasant pain relief phenomenon.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalPain ManagementAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultEmotionsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMalePainPain MeasurementPain PerceptionPain ThresholdPsychophysicsStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID29973965
PMCPMC6008746
OpenAlexW2806507897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.