Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973958›Full record

ArticleEvidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice2018

Right Here Right Now (RHRN) pilot study: testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health.

Lynn Naven, Greig Inglis, Rachel Harris, Gillian Fergie, Gemma Teal, Rebecca Phipps, Sally Stewart, Lorna Kelly, Shona Hilton, Madeline Smith and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. An Approach to Dynamic Sensing Data Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
  2. Just Google it: Measuring schools' use of research evidence with internet search results.Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lynn NavenGlasgow Centre for Population Health, UK.
Greig InglisUniversity of Edinburgh, UK.
Rachel HarrisNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
Gillian FergieUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
Gemma TealGlasgow School of Art, UK.
Rebecca PhippsUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
Sally StewartGlasgow Caledonian University, UK.
Lorna KellyNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK.
Shona HiltonUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
Madeline SmithGlasgow School of Art, UK.
Gerry McCartneyNHS Health Scotland, UK.
David WalshGlasgow Centre for Population Health, UK.
Matthew TolanUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
James EganGlasgow Centre for Population Health, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInforming policy and practice with up-to-date evidence on the social determinants of health is an ongoing challenge. One limitation of traditional approaches is the time-lag between identification of a policy or practice need and availability of results. The Right Here Right Now (RHRN) study piloted a near-real-time data-collection process to investigate whether this gap could be bridged.

methodsA website was developed to facilitate the issue of questions, data capture and presentation of findings. Respondents were recruited using two distinct methods - a clustered random probability sample, and a quota sample from street stalls. Weekly four-part questions were issued by email, Short Messaging Service (SMS or text) or post. Quantitative data were descriptively summarised, qualitative data thematically analysed, and a summary report circulated two weeks after each question was issued. The pilot spanned 26 weeks.

resultsIt proved possible to recruit and retain a panel of respondents providing quantitative and qualitative data on a range of issues. The samples were subject to similar recruitment and response biases as more traditional data-collection approaches. Participants valued the potential to influence change, and stakeholders were enthusiastic about the findings generated, despite reservations about the lack of sample representativeness. Stakeholders acknowledged that decision-making processes are not flexible enough to respond to weekly evidence.

conclusionRHRN produced a process for collecting near-real-time data for policy-relevant topics, although obtaining and maintaining representative samples was problematic. Adaptations were identified to inform a more sustainable model of near-real-time data collection and dissemination in the future.

Indexed as

evidencepolicyreal-timetechnology

Identifiers

PMID29973958
PMCPMC6027954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.