Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973774›Full record

ReviewSarcoma2018

Role of High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Children and Young Adults with Relapsed Ewing's Sarcoma: A Systematic Review.

Pavan Tenneti, Umar Zahid, Ahmad Iftikhar, Seongseok Yun, Atif Sohail, Zabih Warraich, Faiz Anwer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sarcoma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Low Dose Cyclophospahamide is a Feasable Mobilization Regimen in the Covid-19 Era: A Single Center Study from Türkiye.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavan TennetiDepartment of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-0470
Umar ZahidDepartment of Biostatics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Ahmad IftikharDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Seongseok YunMalignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7343-1635
Atif SohailDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Zabih WarraichDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Faiz AnwerDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-7439
University of Arizona · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRelapsed Ewing's sarcoma (RES) is an aggressive malignancy with poor survival. Although high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) given after conventional chemotherapy (CC) has shown survival benefits, it is not generally used in the United States for RES. We performed a systemic review to evaluate the benefits of HDCT for RES.

methodsLiterature search involved Medline, Embase, and Cochrane database. We included studies with RES patients treated with HDCT/ASCT.

resultsTwenty-four studies with total of 345 reported RES patients that got HDCT were included in final analysis. Seventeen studies had patients with multiple malignancies including RES, while seven had only RES patients. At 2 and 3-5 years, event-free survival (EFS) in studies with only RES patients ranged 42-47% and 20-61% and overall survival (OS) ranged 50-66% and 33-77%, respectively. In studies with combined patients that reported outcomes of RES separately, the EFS at 1-3 and 4 years was 36-66% and 17-50%, respectively. The OS at 1-2 and 3-4 years was 40-60% and 50-70%.

conclusionsMost studies using HDCT/ASCT as consolidation regimen showed improved survival benefits compared to CC. Randomized controlled studies are needed to determine true clinical benefits of HDCT followed by ASCT in patients with RES.

Identifiers

PMID29973774
PMCPMC6008812
OpenAlexW2805267627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.