Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973664›Full record

Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2018

Umbilical cord milking for neonates who are depressed at birth: a randomized trial of feasibility.

Meenakshi Girish, Vinita Jain, Rohinie Dhokane, Shital B Gondhali, Ashish Vaidya, Zubair H Aghai

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping in term infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cord management in non-vigorous newborns.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
    Article
  10. Umbilical cord milking-benefits and risks.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Umbilical cord milking in preterm infants: time to act.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Umbilical cord milking in asphyxiated neonates: ethical dilemmas.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Placental Transfusion for Asphyxiated Infants.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019
    Review
  18. Umbilical Cord Milking: A Review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meenakshi GirishPediatrics, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. meenakshimgirish@gmail.com.
Vinita JainPediatrics, Daga Memorial Women & Child Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Rohinie DhokanePediatrics, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Shital B GondhaliPediatrics, Government Medical College, Latur, Maharashtra, India.
Ashish VaidyaPediatrics, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Zubair H AghaiPediatrics/Neonatology, Thomas Jefferson University/Nemours, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of umbilical cord milking (UCM) in neonates who are depressed at birth. STUDY

designThis is a quasi-randomized, non-blinded, controlled trial on infants (≥35 weeks) who were depressed at birth. UCM (cord milked three times) was performed during the even months and the neonates born during the odd months were in the control group. Primary outcome was feasibility and safety.

resultsA total of 101 infants were enrolled (50 UCM group and 51 control group) between January 2015 and October 2016. UCM was performed in 95% of infants (59/62) who qualified to receive UCM. There were no significant differences in resuscitation delay, resuscitation efforts, and short-term outcomes between the two groups.

conclusionsUCM is feasible for term and late preterm infants who are depressed at birth. A larger clinical trial is needed to evaluate long-term benefits of UCM in neonates with HIE.

Indexed as

Fetal BloodPlacental CirculationBlood TransfusionConstrictionFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePregnancyResuscitationUmbilical Cord

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.