Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973630›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Development of outbred CD1 mouse colonies with distinct standardized gut microbiota profiles for use in complex microbiota targeted studies.

Marcia L Hart, Aaron C Ericsson, K C Kent Lloyd, Kristin N Grimsrud, Allison R Rogala, Virginia L Godfrey, Judith N Nielsen, Craig L Franklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The mutant mouse resource and research center (MMRRC) consortium: the US-based public mouse repository system.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The gut microbiome of laboratory mice: considerations and best practices for translational research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcia L HartComparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Aaron C EricssonComparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
K C Kent LloydMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-4144
Kristin N GrimsrudMouse Biology Program, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Allison R RogalaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Virginia L GodfreyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Judith N NielsenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Craig L FranklinComparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America. franklinc@missouri.edu.

Funding

UCD Mutant Mouse Regional Resource CenterU42OD012210 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KC KENT LLOYD · 2012 to 2026
$29.2M
The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI James Amos-Landgraf · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
Resource Section - Core 001U42OD010924 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TERRY R MAGNUSON · 2012 to 2026
$24.5M
National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource CenterP40OD010995 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ryan B Sartor · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center (MMPC) at UC DavisU2CDK092993 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LLOYD, KC KENT · 2016 to 2021
$5.9M
Postdoctoral Training in Comparative MedicineT32OD011126 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI Elizabeth C Bryda, Aaron Ericsson · 2012 to 2026
$3.4M
Impact of gut microbiota and segmented filamentous bacteria on colitis-associated colorectal cancerK01OD019924 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ERICSSON, AARON · 2016 to 2020
$573k
NIDDK NIH HHS U2C DK092993NIH HHS K01 OD019924NIH HHS P40 OD010995NIH HHS T32 OD011126NIH HHS U42 OD010918NIH HHS U42 OD010924NIH HHS U42 OD012210U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 OD0112639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies indicate that the gut microbiota (GM) can significantly influence both local and systemic host physiologic processes. With rising concern for optimization of experimental reproducibility and translatability, it is essential to consider the GM in study design. However, GM profiles can vary between rodent producers making consistency between models challenging. To circumvent this, we developed outbred CD1 mouse colonies with stable, complex GM profiles that can be used as donors for a variety of GM transfer techniques including rederivation, co-housing, cross-foster, and fecal microbiota transfer (FMT). CD1 embryos were surgically transferred into CD1 or C57BL/6 surrogate dams that varied by GM composition and complexity to establish four separate mouse colonies harboring GM profiles representative of contemporary mouse producers. Using targeted 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, subsequent female offspring were found to have similar GM profiles to surrogate dams. Furthermore, breeding colonies of CD1 mice with distinct GM profiles were maintained for nine generations, demonstrating GM stability within these colonies. To confirm GM stability, we shipped cohorts of these four colonies to collaborating institutions and found no significant variation in GM composition. These mice are an invaluable experimental resource that can be used to investigate GM effects on mouse model phenotype.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBreedingEmbryo TransferFecal Microbiota TransplantationFemaleHousing, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, Animal

Identifiers

PMID29973630
PMCPMC6031694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.