ArticleScientific reports2018
Combing signal processing methods with algorithm priori information to produce synergetic improvements on continuous imaging of brain electrical impedance tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An improved Wexler algorithm for electrical impedance tomography using finite element method and gradient based overrelaxation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advances in electrical impedance tomography-based brain imaging.Military Medical Research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic electrical impedance tomography (EIT) promises to be a valuable technique for monitoring the development of brain injury. But in practical long-term monitoring, noise and interferences may cause insufficient image quality. To help unveil intracranial conductivity changes, signal processing methods were introduced to improve EIT data quality and algorithms were optimized to be more robust. However, gains for EIT image reconstruction can be significantly increased if we combine the two techniques properly. The basic idea is to apply the priori information in algorithm to help de-noise EIT data and use signal processing to optimize algorithm. First, we process EIT data with principal component analysis (PCA) and reconstruct an initial CT-EIT image. Then, as the priori that changes in scalp and skull domains are unwanted, we eliminate their corresponding boundary voltages from data sets. After the two-step denoising process, we finally re-select a local optimal regularization parameter and accomplish the reconstruction. To evaluate performances of the signal processing-priori information based reconstruction (SPR) method, we conducted simulation and in-vivo experiments. The results showed SPR could improve brain EIT image quality and recover the intracranial perturbations from certain bad measurements, while for some measurement data the generic reconstruction method failed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.