Observational studyBMC pharmacology & toxicology2018
Characterization of differential patient profiles and therapeutic responses of pharmacy customers for four ambroxol formulations.
Observational study in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors for change in cough-related quality of life and symptom severity in acute cough: results of an observational pharmacy-based study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Real-world effects of hyoscine butylbromide combined with paracetamol in women with dysmenorrhea: a patient survey.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Correlation of effectiveness and tolerability assessments from a pharmacy-based observational study investigating the fixed-dose combination of 400 mg ibuprofen plus 100 mg caffeine for the treatment of acute headache.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Self-Medication for the Treatment of Abdominal Cramps and Pain-A Real-Life Comparison of Three Frequently Used Preparations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of the Neck and/or Shoulder Pain on Self-reported Headache Treatment Responses - Results From a Pharmacy-Based Patient Survey.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- How can real-world evidence aid decision making during the life cycle of nonprescription medicines?Clinical and translational science · 2022Review
- Thermo-Analytical and Compatibility Study with Mechanistic Explanation of Degradation Kinetics of Ambroxol Hydrochloride Tablets under Non-Isothermal Conditions.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Antitussive effects of NaEuropean journal of pharmacology · 2021Article
- Pharmacokinetics of Ambroxol Sustained Release (MucosolvanPulmonary therapy · 2020Article
- An overview of efficacy and safety of ambroxol for the treatment of acute and chronic respiratory diseases with a special regard to children.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmbroxol relieves cough symptoms based on its secretagogue, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, immunomodulatory and local anesthetic effects. The present study was designed to explore differential patient profiles and efficacy against acute respiratory symptoms of four formulations registered as over-the-counter medicines.
methodsNine hundred sixty-five pharmacy customers purchasing one of four branded ambroxol formulations (extended release capsules, adult syrup, pediatric syrup and soft pastilles) filled a questionnaire including a patient-adapted version of the Bronchitis Severity Scale, several questions on degree of impairment by acute cough, time to onset of symptom relief and duration of treatment. Data on pediatric syrup users were entered by their parents. Based on the exploratory character of the study, no hypothesis-testing statistical analysis was applied.
resultsUsers of the pediatric syrup and the pastilles reported somewhat less severe baseline symptoms. The patient-adapted Bronchitis Severity Scale proved feasible as a self-administered tool. Among BSS items, ambroxol formulations improved chest pain while coughing to the largest and sputum to smallest degree (- 75% vs. -40%). Reported efficacy was comparable among formulations with minor differences in favor of the pediatric syrup. Time to onset of symptom relief was less than 60 min in more than 90% of patients and occurred prior to known systemic t
conclusionsWe conclude that over-the-counter formulations of ambroxol exhibit comparable user profiles and efficacy. Differences in speed of onset of symptom relief may involve not only those in systemic pharmacokinetics but also local anesthetic effects of immediate release formulations. Differences between pediatric and adult syrup may in part reflect reporting bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.