Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973292›Full record

Observational studyBMC pharmacology & toxicology2018

Characterization of differential patient profiles and therapeutic responses of pharmacy customers for four ambroxol formulations.

Peter Kardos, Kai-Michael Beeh, Ulrike Sent, Tobias Mueck, Heidemarie Gräter, Martin C Michel

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pharmacology & toxicology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Antitussive effects of NaEuropean journal of pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter KardosGroup Practice, Center for Allergy, Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Red Cross Maingau Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Kai-Michael Beehinsaf Respiratory Resarch Institute, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Ulrike SentMedical Affairs Consumer Healthcare, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt-Hoechst, Germany.
Tobias MueckMedical Affairs Consumer Healthcare, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt-Hoechst, Germany.
Heidemarie GräterMedical Affairs Consumer Healthcare, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt-Hoechst, Germany.
Martin C MichelDepartment of Pharmacology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Obere Zahlbacher Str. 67, 55131, Mainz, Germany. marmiche@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4161-8467
Sanofi (Germany) · DEGerman Red Cross · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DERespiratory Research Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbroxol relieves cough symptoms based on its secretagogue, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, immunomodulatory and local anesthetic effects. The present study was designed to explore differential patient profiles and efficacy against acute respiratory symptoms of four formulations registered as over-the-counter medicines.

methodsNine hundred sixty-five pharmacy customers purchasing one of four branded ambroxol formulations (extended release capsules, adult syrup, pediatric syrup and soft pastilles) filled a questionnaire including a patient-adapted version of the Bronchitis Severity Scale, several questions on degree of impairment by acute cough, time to onset of symptom relief and duration of treatment. Data on pediatric syrup users were entered by their parents. Based on the exploratory character of the study, no hypothesis-testing statistical analysis was applied.

resultsUsers of the pediatric syrup and the pastilles reported somewhat less severe baseline symptoms. The patient-adapted Bronchitis Severity Scale proved feasible as a self-administered tool. Among BSS items, ambroxol formulations improved chest pain while coughing to the largest and sputum to smallest degree (- 75% vs. -40%). Reported efficacy was comparable among formulations with minor differences in favor of the pediatric syrup. Time to onset of symptom relief was less than 60 min in more than 90% of patients and occurred prior to known systemic t

conclusionsWe conclude that over-the-counter formulations of ambroxol exhibit comparable user profiles and efficacy. Differences in speed of onset of symptom relief may involve not only those in systemic pharmacokinetics but also local anesthetic effects of immediate release formulations. Differences between pediatric and adult syrup may in part reflect reporting bias.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbroxolBronchitisChildChild, PreschoolCoughDosage FormsDrug CompoundingExpectorantsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedAmbroxolDosage FormsExpectorantsNonprescription DrugsAcute coughAmbroxolNon-interventional studyPharmacy setting

Identifiers

PMID29973292
PMCPMC6030777
OpenAlexW2810770741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.