Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973241›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Safe Birth and Cultural Safety in southern Mexico: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Iván Sarmiento, Sergio Paredes-Solís, Neil Andersson, Anne Cockcroft

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Iván SarmientoCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, H3S 1Z1, Quebec, Canada. ivan.sarmiento@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-1464
Sergio Paredes-SolísCentro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Calle Pino s/n Colonia El Roble, postal code 39640, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico.
Neil AnderssonCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, H3S 1Z1, Quebec, Canada.
Anne CockcroftCIET/PRAM, Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, 5858 Chemin de la Côte-des-Neiges 3rd Floor, Suite 300, Montreal, H3S 1Z1, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CAUniversidad Autónoma de Guerrero · MX

Funding

McGill University (CA) T244294C0GThe National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico PDCPN-2013-214858The Quebec Population Health Research Network FRQ-S fund 246806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndigenous women in the southern Mexican state of Guerrero face poor maternal health outcomes. Living as they do at the very periphery of the Western health system, they often receive low-quality care from health services that lack human and financial resources. Traditional health systems remain active in indigenous communities where traditional midwives accompany women through motherhood. Several interventions have explored training birth attendants in Western birthing skills, but little research has focussed on supporting traditional midwives by recognising their knowledge. This trial supports traditional midwifery in four indigenous groups and measures its impact on maternal health outcomes.

methodsThe study includes four indigenous populations in the State of Guerrero (Nahua, Na savi/Mixteco, Me'phaa/Tlapaneco and Nancue ñomndaa/Amuzgo), covering approximately 8000 households. A parallel-group cluster-randomised controlled trial will compare communities receiving usual care with communities where traditional midwives received support in addition to the usual care. The intervention was defined in collaboration with participants in a 2012 pilot study. Supported midwives will receive a small stipend, a scholarship to train one apprentice, and support from an intercultural broker to deal with Western health personnel; additionally, the health staff in the intervention municipalities will participate in workshops to improve understanding and attitudes towards authentic traditional midwives. A baseline and a final survey will measure changes in birth and pregnancy complications (primary outcomes), and changes in gender violence, access to healthcare, and engagement with traditional cultural activities (secondary outcomes). The project has ethical approval from the participating communities and the Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero. DISCUSSION: Indigenous women at the periphery of Western health services do not benefit fully from the attenuated services which erode their own healthcare traditions. Western health service providers in indigenous communities often ignore traditional knowledge and resources, inadvertently or in ignorance, disrespecting indigenous cultures. Improved understanding between midwives and the official healthcare system can contribute to more appropriate referral of high-risk cases, improving the use of scarce resources while lowering costs of healthcare for indigenous families.

trial registrationISRCTN12397283 . Retrospectively registered on 6 December 2016.

Indexed as

Health Services, IndigenousMidwiferyParturitionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSafety ManagementFemaleHumansMaternal HealthMexicoOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancySample SizeAboriginal healthCultural safetyEpidemiologyEquity in accessRandomised Controlled TrialTraditional midwives

Identifiers

PMID29973241
PMCPMC6033215
OpenAlexW2810000559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.