Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973196›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health geographics2018

Geospatial blockchain: promises, challenges, and scenarios in health and healthcare.

Maged N Kamel Boulos, James T Wilson, Kevin A Clauson

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health geographics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Biomedical blockchain with practical implementations and quantitative evaluations: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Applications of Blockchain in the Medical Field: Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. State-of-the-Art Research in Blockchain of Things for HealthCare.Arabian journal for science and engineering · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Trends, Technologies, and Key Challenges in Smart and Connected Healthcare.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Blockchain: chaining digital health to a new era.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maged N Kamel BoulosMoray College, University of the Highlands and Islands, Elgin, IV30 1JJ, Scotland, UK. mnkboulos@ieee.org.ORCID 0000-0003-2400-6303
James T WilsonLipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Nashville, TN, 37204-3951, USA.
Kevin A ClausonLipscomb University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Nashville, TN, 37204-3951, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A PubMed query run in June 2018 using the keyword 'blockchain' retrieved 40 indexed papers, a reflection of the growing interest in blockchain among the medical and healthcare research and practice communities. Blockchain's foundations of decentralisation, cryptographic security and immutability make it a strong contender in reshaping the healthcare landscape worldwide. Blockchain solutions are currently being explored for: (1) securing patient and provider identities; (2) managing pharmaceutical and medical device supply chains; (3) clinical research and data monetisation; (4) medical fraud detection; (5) public health surveillance; (6) enabling truly public and open geo-tagged data; (7) powering many Internet of Things-connected autonomous devices, wearables, drones and vehicles, via the distributed peer-to-peer apps they run, to deliver the full vision of smart healthy cities and regions; and (8) blockchain-enabled augmented reality in crisis mapping and recovery scenarios, including mechanisms for validating, crediting and rewarding crowdsourced geo-tagged data, among other emerging use cases. Geospatially-enabled blockchain solutions exist today that use a crypto-spatial coordinate system to add an immutable spatial context that regular blockchains lack. These geospatial blockchains do not just record an entry's specific time, but also require and validate its associated proof of location, allowing accurate spatiotemporal mapping of physical world events. Blockchain and distributed ledger technology face similar challenges as any other technology threatening to disintermediate legacy processes and commercial interests, namely the challenges of blockchain interoperability, security and privacy, as well as the need to find suitable and sustainable business models of implementation. Nevertheless, we expect blockchain technologies to get increasingly powerful and robust, as they become coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) in various real-word healthcare solutions involving AI-mediated data exchange on blockchains.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialitySpatial AnalysisDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient ParticipationBlockchainClinical trialsCryptographyCrypto-spatial coordinate systemDistributed ledger technologyGeospatial blockchainHealthcareInternet of ThingsPharmaceuticalsSmart citiesSmart contractsSupply chain

Identifiers

PMID29973196
PMCPMC6033217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.