Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973188›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2018

The development, implementation and evaluation of interventions to reduce workplace sitting: a qualitative systematic review and evidence-based operational framework.

Kelly Mackenzie, Elizabeth Such, Paul Norman, Elizabeth Goyder

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Using Co-Production to Develop "Sit Less at Work" Interventions in a Range of Organisations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Underlying Factors Explaining Physical Behaviors among Office Workers-An Exploratory Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Understanding practitioner perspectives of youth healthcare using thematic and lexical analyses.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kelly MackenzieSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK. kelly.mackenzie@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8431-0465
Elizabeth SuchSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Paul NormanDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Cathedral Court, 1 Vicar Lane, Sheffield, S1 2LT, UK.
Elizabeth GoyderSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2016-09-023National Institute for Health Research DRF-2016-09-023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProlonged sitting is associated with increased risks of cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes, some cancers, musculoskeletal disorders and premature mortality. Workplaces contribute to a large proportion of daily sitting time, particularly among office-based workers. Interventions to reduce workplace sitting therefore represent important public health initiatives. Previous systematic reviews suggest such interventions can be effective but have reported wide variations. Further, there is uncertainty as to whether effectiveness in controlled trials can be replicated when implemented outside the research setting. The aims of this review are to identify factors important for the implementation of workplace sitting interventions and to translate these findings into a useful operational framework to support the future implementation of such interventions.

methodsA qualitative systematic review was conducted. Four health and social science databases were searched for studies set in the workplace, with office-based employees and with the primary aim of reducing workplace sitting. Extracted data were primarily from author descriptions of interventions and their implementation. Inductive thematic analysis and synthesis was undertaken.

resultsForty studies met the inclusion criteria. Nine descriptive themes were identified from which emerged three higher-order analytical themes, which related to the development, implementation and evaluation of workplace sitting interventions. Key findings included: the importance of grounding interventions in theory; utilising participative approaches during intervention development and implementation; and conducting comprehensive process and outcome evaluations. There was a general under-reporting of information relating to the context within which workplace sitting interventions were implemented, such as details of local organisation processes and structures, as well as the wider political and economic landscape, which if present would aid the translation of knowledge into "real-world" settings.

conclusionsThese findings provided the basis for an operational framework, which is a representation of all nine descriptive themes and three higher-order analytical themes, to support workplace sitting intervention development, implementation and evaluation. Once tested and refined, this framework has the potential to be incorporated into a practical toolkit, which could be used by a range of organisations to develop, implement and evaluate their own interventions to reduce workplace sitting time amongst staff.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthSitting PositionWorkplaceClinical Trials as TopicControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsEvaluationFrameworkImplementationIntervention developmentOccupationQualitative systematic reviewSedentary behaviourSitting timeWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID29973188
PMCPMC6033205
OpenAlexW2810311246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.