Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29973123›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2018

Patient Factors That Influence How Physicians Discuss Active Surveillance With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Joanna Veazey Brooks, Shellie D Ellis, Emily Morrow, Kim S Kimminau, J Brantley Thrasher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joanna Veazey Brooks1 Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Shellie D Ellis1 Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Emily Morrow2 Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA.
Kim S Kimminau1 Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
J Brantley Thrasher4 Department of Urology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Heartland Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000001 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2015
$13.0M
HEARTLAND INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHUL1RR033179 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAROHN, RICHARD J. · 2011 to 2011
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000001NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For men diagnosed with prostate cancer, making treatment decisions can be overwhelming. Navigating treatment options, along with potential treatment side effects, can be difficult, and patients often rely heavily on the advice of their physicians. This study was aimed at understanding more about the way urologists talk with their patients about one treatment option: active surveillance (AS), a recognized management strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer that includes close observation and monitoring of the cancer. This study reports, through 22 interviews with urologists, that urologists believe patients are hesitant about AS for a number of reasons, including misperceptions about cancer severity, anxiety, aversion to repeated biopsies that accompany AS, or family member preferences. Because urologists play an influential role in educating patients about treatment options, the discussion around AS can be impacted by barriers that physicians believe matter for their patients. Improving awareness among urologists about what factors impact their patient education about low-risk prostate cancer is important. Identifying tools to improve shared decision making in this area could result in treatment decisions that are increasingly concordant with patients' values, concerns, and goals.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPhysician-Patient RelationsAcademic Medical CentersAgedHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPhysician's RolePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcomeactive surveillancelow-risk prostate cancerphysician–patient communicationprostate cancer treatment

Identifiers

PMID29973123
PMCPMC6142114
OpenAlexW2870984919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.