Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29972816›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2018

Coupling Magnetically Induced Electric Fields to Neurons: Longitudinal and Transverse Activation.

Boshuo Wang, Warren M Grill, Angel V Peterchev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A survey on integral equations for bioelectric modeling.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microglial Cytokines Mediate Plasticity Induced by 10 Hz Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Boshuo WangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Warren M GrillDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Angel V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: angel.peterchev@duke.edu.

Funding

Rational Design of TMS for NeuromodulationR01NS088674 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V, SOMMER, MARC A · 2014 to 2018
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a theory and computational models to couple the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation to neuronal membranes. Based on the characteristics of magnetically induced electric fields and the modified cable equation that we developed previously, quasipotentials are derived as a simple and accurate approximation for coupling of the electric fields to neurons. The conventional and modified cable equations are used to simulate magnetic stimulation of long peripheral nerves by circular and figure-8 coils. Activation thresholds are obtained over a range of lateral and vertical coil positions for two nonlinear membrane models representing unmyelinated and myelinated straight axons and also for undulating myelinated axons. For unmyelinated straight axons, the thresholds obtained with the modified cable equation are significantly lower due to transverse polarization, and the spatial distributions of thresholds as a function of coil position differ significantly from predictions by the activating function. However, the activation thresholds of unmyelinated axons obtained with either cable equation are very high and beyond the output capabilities of conventional magnetic stimulators. For myelinated axons, threshold values are similar for both cable equations and within the range of magnetic stimulators. Whereas the transverse field contributes negligibly to the activation thresholds of myelinated fibers, axonal undulation can significantly increase or decrease thresholds depending on coil position. The analysis provides a rigorous theoretical foundation and implementation methods for the use of the cable equation to model neuronal response to magnetically induced electric fields. Experimentally observed stimulation with the electric fields perpendicular to the nerve trunk cannot be explained by transverse polarization and is likely due to nerve fiber undulation and other geometrical inhomogeneities.

Indexed as

ElectricityMagnetic FieldsAxonsCell MembraneMyelin SheathNeurons

Identifiers

PMID29972816
PMCPMC6035313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.