Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29972724›Full record

ArticlePlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)2019

Seed ecology of the geophyte Conopodium majus (Apiaceae), indicator species of ancient woodland understories and oligotrophic meadows.

C Blandino, E Fernández-Pascual, M Marin, A Vernet, H W Pritchard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Maximising the use of native seeds in restoration projects.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

C BlandinoComparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, West Sussex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7176-2024
E Fernández-PascualComparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, West Sussex, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-9577
M MarinEarth and Environmental Sciences Department, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-1202
A VernetDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Wellcome Trust Centre For Human Genetics, Radcliffe, UK.
H W PritchardComparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, West Sussex, UK.
University of Pavia · ITCentre for Human Genetics · GBRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GBUniversidad de Oviedo · ES

Funding

European Commission ACA14-19European Commission ACB17-19European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013/Government of AsturiasOxford BHF Centre for Research Excellence RE/08/004REA 607785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conopodium majus is a geophyte with pseudomonocotyly, distributed in Atlantic Europe. It is an indicator of two declining European habitats: ancient woodland understories and oligotrophic hay meadows. Attempts to reintroduce it by seed have been hindered by scarce seedling emergence and limited knowledge of its seed biology. Micro-CT scanning was used to assess pseudomonocotyly. Embryo growth and germination were studied in the laboratory and the field, using dissection and image analysis. The effects of temperature, light, nitrate and GA

Indexed as

ApiaceaeEcologyGerminationSeedlingsSeedsDesiccation toleranceembryo morphologymorphological dormancypseudomonocotylyseed germinationseed storage

Identifiers

PMID29972724
PMCPMC6492144
OpenAlexW2811244916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.