Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29972657›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma2019

Validation of fitness tracker for sleep measures in women with asthma.

Jessica Castner, Manoj J Mammen, Carla R Jungquist, Olivia Licata, John J Pender, Gregory E Wilding, Sanjay Sethi

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Windows Into Human Health Through Wearables Data Analytics.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica Castnera The Rockefeller University Heilbrunn Family Center for Research Nursing , New York , NY , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9889-3844
Manoj J Mammend Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Carla R Jungquistf School of Nursing , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4248-1098
Olivia Licatag Department of Materials Design and Innovation, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
John J Penderf School of Nursing , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Gregory E Wildingi Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Sanjay Sethie Department of Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences , University at Buffalo , Buffalo , NY , USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNighttime wakening with asthma symptoms is a key to assessment and therapy decisions, with no gold standard objective measure. The study aims were to (1) determine the feasibility, (2) explore equivalence, and (3) test concordance of a consumer-based accelerometer with standard actigraphy for measurement of sleep patterns in women with asthma as an adjunct to self-report.

methodsPanel study design of women with poorly controlled asthma from a university-affiliated primary care clinic system was used. We assessed sensitivity and specificity, equivalence and concordance of sleep time, sleep efficiency, and wake counts between the consumer-based accelerometer Fitbit Charge™ and Actigraph wGT3X+. We linked data between devices for comparison both automatically by 24-hour period and manually by sleep segment.

resultsAnalysis included 424 938 minutes, 738 nights, and 833 unique sleep segments from 47 women. The fitness tracker demonstrated 97% sensitivity and 40% specificity to identify sleep. Between device equivalence for total sleep time (15 and 42-minute threshold) was demonstrated by sleep segment. Concordance improved for wake counts and sleep efficiency when adjusting for a linear trend.

conclusionsThere were important differences in total sleep time, efficiency, and wake count measures when comparing individual sleep segments versus 24-hour measures of sleep. Fitbit overestimates sleep efficiency and underestimates wake counts in this population compared to actigraphy. Low levels of systematic bias indicate the potential for raw measurements from the devices to achieve equivalence and concordance with additional processing, algorithm modification, and modeling. Fitness trackers offer an accessible and inexpensive method to quantify sleep patterns in the home environment as an adjunct to subjective reports, and require further informatics development.

Indexed as

ActigraphyFitness TrackersPolysomnographyAdolescentAdultAsthmaFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSleepYoung Adultactigraphyasthmafitness trackersleep disruptionwomen

Identifiers

PMID29972657
PMCPMC6522318
OpenAlexW2811147007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.