Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29972594›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018

Older Adult and Surrogate Perspectives on Serious, Difficult, and Important Medical Decisions.

Laura A Petrillo, Ryan D McMahan, Victoria Tang, Daniel Dohan, Rebecca L Sudore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Aging-in-place versus long-term care conflicts experienced by older adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Projection of Care Partners' Preferences in the Proxy Assessments of Everyday Preferences for Persons With Cognitive Impairment.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Palliative Care for Parkinson Disease.Clinics in geriatric medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura A PetrilloDivision of Palliative Care and Geriatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ryan D McMahanSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Victoria TangDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Daniel DohanSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Rebecca L SudoreDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4436-2209

Funding

Improving advance care planning for seniors at risk for Alzheimers disease and related dementias and their caregiversR01AG045043 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI SUDORE, REBECCA L · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NIA NIH HHS AG045043NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045043Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDR-1306-01500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo elicit decisions that diverse older adults and surrogates perceive as serious, difficult, or important and explore what helped them make those decisions.

designFocus groups (N=13) in which participants were asked to recall serious, difficult, or important medical decisions and what helped them make those decisions.

settingClinics, support groups and senior centers.

participantsDiverse English- and Spanish-speaking older adults (age: mean 78, range 64-89) and surrogates (age: mean 57, range 33-76) (29% African American, 26% white, 26% Asian or Pacific Islander, 19% Hispanic) (N=69). MEASUREMENTS: We used thematic analysis to analyze transcripts.

resultsWe identified 168 decisions. Older adults from all racial and ethnic groups frequently recalled cancer treatment decisions and decisions about chronic illness management. Surrogates described decisions about transitions in care and medical crises. Older adults valued self-sufficiency and maximizing survival and relied on personal experiences as often as medical advice. In all racial and ethnic groups, surrogates valued avoiding suffering for loved ones.

conclusionDiverse older adults and surrogates perceive life-threatening illness and day-to-day decisions about chronic disease to be serious, difficult, and important. The surrogates' goal of avoiding suffering of older adults may differ from older adults' priorities of self-sufficiency and maximizing survival. Clinicians should support older adults and surrogates in identifying important and difficult decisions and learn about the values and information sources they bring to decision-making. With this knowledge, clinicians can customize decision support and achieve person-centered care.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAdvance Care PlanningAdvance DirectivesAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanChronic DiseaseFemaleFocus GroupsHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedTerminal CareWhite Peopleadvance care planningmedical decision-makingperson-centered careserious illness

Identifiers

PMID29972594
PMCPMC6167167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.