Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2018
Speed-of-Processing Training in Assisted and Independent Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computerized Games versus Crosswords Training in Mild Cognitive Impairment.NEJM evidence · 2022Trial
- Speed of processing training and depression in assisted and independent living: A randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Speed-of-Processing Training in Assisted and Independent Living: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2018Trial
- Characteristics of Eye Movements and Correlation to Cognitive Functions in Relation to the Location of Guide Signs and Driving Speed.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Digital technologies in care for older adults living alone: a scoping review.Innovation in aging · 2026Review
- Speed of Processing Training for Stress Adaptation in Caregivers of a Family Member With Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- A Conceptual View of Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Decline-A Systemic Review.Frontiers in aging · 2022Review
- Does Visual Speed of Processing Training Improve Health-Related Quality of Life in Assisted and Independent Living Communities?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Innovation in aging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine speed-of-processing training (SOPT) in older adults in senior living communities, especially those in assisted living.
designTwo-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial.
settingAssisted and independent residence settings in 31 senior living communities.
participantsIndividuals aged 55 to 102 (mean 81.0, 73.8% female, 76.4% living alone, 47.0% residing in assisted living; N=351).
interventionThe intervention was 10 hours of computerized SOPT at baseline with 4-hour boosters at 5 and 11 months; the attention control was 10 hours of solving computerized crossword puzzles at baseline with 4-hour boosters at 5 and 11 months. MEASURES: Outcomes were useful field of view (UFOV) scores and improvements of 0.5 standard deviations (SDs) or more (> 158.4 ms). Data collection occurred at baseline, after training, and 6 and 12 months. Random-effects linear mixed-effect models were used to estimate SOPT effects in intention-to-treat complete-case and multiple imputation analyses.
resultsWe found statistically significantly small standardized effect sizes (Cohen's d
conclusionThese findings support public health messaging about the potential benefits of SOPT for older adults in senior living communities and support the feasibility and acceptability of SOPT in assisted and independent living for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.