Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29972404›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2018

EVALUATION OF ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA: FROM SYMPTOMS TO THE CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION.

Rafael Melillo Laurino-Neto, Fernando Herbella, Francisco Schlottmann, Marco Patti

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04798547 (Outcomes of Short-length vs Standard-length Myotomy Using Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04798547 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Outcomes of Short-length vs Standard-length Myotomy Using Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2020 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsAchalasiaArmsShort Myotomy, Standard Length Myotomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modern Achalasia: Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effective factors of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of achalasia.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. VALIDATION OF A NEW WATER-PERFUSED HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY SYSTEM.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rafael Melillo Laurino-NetoDepartamento de Cirurgia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP.
Fernando HerbellaDepartamento de Cirurgia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, SP.
Francisco SchlottmannDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Marco PattiDepartment of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe diagnosis of achalasia may be suggested by clinical features but a complete work-up is required not only to confirm the diagnosis but also to grade the disease by severity or clinical subtype.

objectiveTo review the current evaluation of esophageal achalasia and its correct comprehension.

methodThe literature review was based on papers published on Medline/Pubmed, SciELO and Lilacs, crossing the following headings: "esophageal achalasia"; "deglutition disorders"; "diagnostic techniques", "digestive system"; "endoscopy, digestive system"; "manometry".

resultsThe diagnosis of achalasia is suggested by clinical features but is not sufficient to distinguish this from other esophageal disease. It must be confirmed by further diagnostic tests, such as esophagogastroduodenoscopy, barium swallow and manometry. Recent advances in diagnostic methods, including high resolution manometry might even help predicting outcome or selected more appropriate procedures to treat the disease.

conclusionA detailed and systematic study of achalasia patients allows not only a correct diagnosis but also contributes to therapeutic decision making and prognosis.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaHumans

Identifiers

PMID29972404
PMCPMC6044194
OpenAlexW2873751982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.