ArticleFaraday discussions2018
Positively charged residues at the channel mouth boost single-file water flow.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Yeast Complementation Assays Demonstrating the Importance of the Affinity Tag Position in Membrane Protein Purification, as Exemplified bySmall science · 2025Article
- Finely tuned water structure and transport in functionalized carbon nanotube membranes during desalination.RSC advances · 2024Article
- Entropic barrier of water permeation through single-file channels.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Proton Migration on Top of Charged Membranes.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Cortisol Interaction with Aquaporin-2 Modulates Its Water Permeability: Perspectives for Non-Genomic Effects of Corticosteroids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Impacts of Surface Adsorption on Water Uptake within a Metal Organic Nanotube Material.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2022Article
- Honey, I shrunk the extracellular space: Measurements and mechanisms of astrocyte swelling.Glia · 2022Review
- Multiple pore lining residues modulate water permeability of GlpF.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- High-Flux Ultrafiltration Membranes Combining Artificial Water Channels and Covalent Organic Frameworks.Membranes · 2022Article
- ScatteringNanoscale advances · 2021Article
- The energetic barrier to single-file water flow through narrow channels.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Foldamer-based ultrapermeable and highly selective artificial water channels that exclude protons.Nature nanotechnology · 2021Article
- Native-like membrane models of E. coli polar lipid extract shed light on the importance of lipid composition complexity.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Water in Nanopores and Biological Channels: A Molecular Simulation Perspective.Chemical reviews · 2020Review
- Transient domains of ordered water induced by divalent ions lead to lipid membrane curvature fluctuations.Communications chemistry · 2020Article
- PRDM9 forms a trimer by interactions within the zinc finger array.Life science alliance · 2019Article
- Review
- Single-file transport of water through membrane channels.Faraday discussions · 2018Article
- Quantification of Water Flux in Vesicular Systems.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water molecules lose two of their four bulk neighbours when entering single-file channels. This process may be sensitive to the presence of positive and negative charges at the channel mouth, since the costs for dehydrating cations and anions differ by a large margin. However, it is not known whether entrance charges affect the single channel water permeability (pf). So far, pf is only known to be governed by H-bond formation between permeating water molecules and wall-lining residues. Here we compare the pf values of five different aquaporin species (AQP1, AQPZ, AQP4 wild type, and two phosphorylation mimicking AQP4 mutants) that offer the same number of hydrogen bond donating and receiving residues in their single-file region but display different entrance charges. The pf measurements were performed with reconstituted lipid vesicles. We assessed (i) the osmotically induced vesicle deflation from the light scattering intensity in a stopped-flow device and (ii) the aquaporin abundance by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. Substitution of serine at positions 111 and 180 in AQP4 for aspartic acid showed only a marginal effect on pf, suggesting that negative entrance charges are of minor importance. In contrast, the total number of positively charged amino acid side chains at entrances and exits correlates with pf: a total of three, four and seven charges of AQP4, AQPZ, and AQP1 translate into pf values of 1.1, 1.8, and 3.2 × 10-13 cm3 s-1, respectively. Thus, positive interfacial charges boost the pf value of AQP1 to three times the value of AQP4. Nevertheless, the number of hydrogen bond donating and receiving residues in the single-file region remains the major determinant of pf. Their effect on pf may be a hundredfold larger than that of interfacial charges.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.