ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2019
Clarifying cognitive control and the controllable connectome.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of methylphenidate on functional controllability: a preliminary study in medication-naïve children with ADHD.Translational psychiatry · 2022Trial
- Task-induced topological and geometrical changes in whole-brain dynamics predict cognitive individual differences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of the Rich Club in Network Control of Neurocognitive States.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- On the control of recurrent neural networks using constant inputs.IEEE transactions on automatic control · 2026Article
- The Endocannabinoid-Microbiota-Neuroimmune Super-System: A Unifying Feedback Architecture for Systems Resilience, Collapse Trajectories, and Precision Feedback Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Brain-based predictive modeling of mind-wandering and involuntary thought: the idiographic approach.Technology, mind, and behavior · 2025Article
- Contributions of network structure, chemoarchitecture and diagnostic categories to transitions between cognitive topographies.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Age-related differences in network controllability are mitigated by redundancy in large-scale brain networks.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Transitions between cognitive topographies: contributions of network structure, neuromodulation, and disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The complexity of the stream of consciousness.Communications biology · 2022Article
- The expanding horizons of network neuroscience: From description to prediction and control.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Alterations in white matter network dynamics in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- The missing role of gray matter in studying brain controllability.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Structure-informed functional connectivity driven by identifiable and state-specific control regions.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021Article
- Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
- Implementing a concept network model.Behavior research methods · 2019Article
- A network engineering perspective on probing and perturbing cognition with neurofeedback.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive control researchers aim to describe the processes that support adaptive cognition to achieve specific goals. Control theorists consider how to influence the state of systems to reach certain user-defined goals. In brain networks, some conceptual and lexical similarities between cognitive control and control theory offer appealing avenues for scientific discovery. However, these opportunities also come with the risk of conceptual confusion. Here, I suggest that each field of inquiry continues to produce novel and distinct insights. Then, I describe opportunities for synergistic research at the intersection of these subdisciplines with a critical stance that reduces the risk of conceptual confusion. Through this exercise, we can observe that both cognitive neuroscience and systems engineering have much to contribute to cognitive control research in human brain networks. This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Cognition Computer Science > Neural Networks Neuroscience > Clinical Neuroscience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.