ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018
Assessment of arsenic removal efficiency by an iron oxide-coated sand filter process.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomics Analysis and Biochemical Profiling of Arsenic-Induced Metabolic Impairment and Disease Susceptibility.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Treatment of metal (loid) contaminated solutions using iron-peat as sorbent: is landfilling a suitable management option for the spent sorbent?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arsenic is among the most dangerous contaminants which can limit groundwater use for drinking water consumption. Among the most diffused As-removal technologies around the world, adsorptive media systems are usually favored for relatively low cost and simplicity of operation. This study examines the performance of a laboratory-scale iron oxide-coated sand (IOCS) column filter, to remove arsenic (arsenate (As[V]) and arsenite (As[III])) from groundwater. This technology could be adopted in small communities, as it showed consistent removal rates of 99% with an easy-to-operate process. Some considerations about the possible introduction of such technology in developing countries are provided, highlighting the general impacts to human health related to high arsenic concentrations in groundwater. This, among other adsorption processes, could be recommended as a sustainable mean of ensuring good drinking water quality in developing regions, reducing human health impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29971744What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.