Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971693›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2018

Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations "Militant"? : Patient Protest in a Medical Controversy.

Charlotte Blease, Keith J Geraghty

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How and why patients made Long Covid.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Charlotte BleaseGeneral Medicine and Primary Care Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. cblease@bidmc.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0205-1165
Keith J GeraghtyCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, School of Community Based Medicine, University of Manchester, 7.29, Williamson Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, USA.
University College Dublin · IE

Funding

Irish Research Council (IE)-Marie Sklodowska Curie Global Fellowship CLNE2017/226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a contested illness category. This paper investigates the common claim that patients with ME/CFS-and by extension, ME/CFS patient organizations (POs)-exhibit "militant" social and political tendencies. The paper opens with a history of the protracted scientific disagreement over ME/CFS. We observe that ME/CFS POs, medical doctors, and medical researchers exhibit clear differences in opinion over how to conceptualize this illness. However, we identify a common trope in the discourse over ME/CFS: the claim of "militant" patient activism. Scrutinizing this charge, we find no compelling evidence that the vast majority of patients with ME/CFS, or the POs representing them, have adopted any such militant political policies or behaviours. Instead, we observe key strategic similarities between ME/CFS POs in the United Kingdom and the AIDs activist organizations of the mid-1980s in the United States which sought to engage scientists using the platform of public activism and via scientific publications. Finally, we explore the contours of disagreement between POs and the medical community by drawing on the concept of epistemic injustice. We find that widespread negative stereotyping of patients and the marginalization and exclusion of patient voices by medical authorities provides a better explanation for expressions of frustration among patients with ME/CFS.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationFatigue Syndrome, ChronicOrganizationsPatient AdvocacyPolitical ActivismDissent and DisputesHumansKnowledgePatient SatisfactionPhysician-Patient RelationsPoliticsSocial JusticeStereotypingDoctor–patient communicationEpistemic injusticeHealthcare ethicsME/CFSPatient activism

Identifiers

PMID29971693
OpenAlexW2810960704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.