Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971618›Full record

ArticleCritical ultrasound journal2018

The impact of heart, lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound on prediction of failed extubation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: a prospective observational pilot study.

Kavi Haji, Darsim Haji, David J Canty, Alistair G Royse, Cameron Green, Colin F Royse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical ultrasound journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Patients Who Are Difficult to Wean.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Value of Combination of Heart, Lung, and Diaphragm Ultrasound in Predicting Weaning Outcome of Mechanical Ventilation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kavi HajiDepartment of the Intensive Care Unit, Frankton Hospital, PO Box 52, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia. kevee@bigpond.com.
Darsim HajiFrankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC, Australia.
David J CantyDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Alistair G RoyseUltrasound Education Group, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Cameron GreenDepartment of the Intensive Care Unit, Frankton Hospital, PO Box 52, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Colin F RoyseUltrasound Education Group, Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFailed extubation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients is multifactorial, complex and not well understood. We aimed to identify whether combined transthoracic echocardiography, lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound can predict extubation failure in critically ill patients.

resultsFifty-three participants who were intubated > 48 h and deemed by the treating intensivist ready for extubation underwent a 60-min pre-extubation weaning trial (pressure support ≤ 10 cmH

conclusionsFailed extubation in mechanically ventilated patients is more prevalent if markers of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and loss of lung aeration are present.

Indexed as

DiaphragmEchocardiographyLungRSBIUltrasoundWeaning

Identifiers

PMID29971618
PMCPMC6029991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.