ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2018
The Effect of Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Cardiac Biomarkers: Implications for the Identification of Myocardial Recovery.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Potential of Molecular Hydrogen in Different Heart Failure Models: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Metabolic Consequences of Advanced Chronic Heart Failure and its Modification by Implantation of a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- A systematic methodology for epicardial and epiaortic echocardiography in swine research models.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Activated by a Left Ventricular Assist Device.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Transcriptomal Insights of Heart Failure from Normality to Recovery.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Biomarkers in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Insight on Current Evidence.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation on clinical outcome, inflammatory factors and myocardial injury markers in patients with femoral trochanteric fracture.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Ventricular assist device-promoted recovery and technical aspects of explant.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
- Finding a Needle in a Haystack: Proteomics in Heart Failure.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2020Review
- Contemporary Management Strategies in VAD Infection.Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Reactive fibrosis precedes doxorubicin-induced heart failure through sterile inflammation.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Cardiac Biomarkers in Advanced Heart Failure: How Can They Impact Our Pre-transplant or Pre-LVAD Decision-making.Current heart failure reports · 2019Review
- Heart Failure Symptom Biology in Response to Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.The Journal of cardiovascular nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy serves as mainstay therapy for bridge to transplantation and destination therapy. Evidence is now mounting on the role of LVAD therapy as bridge to recovery. In the current review, we will summarize the data on biomarkers of myocardial recovery following LVAD implantation. RECENT
findingsMyocardial recovery can occur spontaneously, following pharmacological intervention and in the setting of mechanical circulatory support such as LVAD. Several biomarkers such as B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), ST2, etc. have been identified and are being used to guide medical therapy in heart failure (HF) patients. However, recent data raised concern that those biomarkers may not be helpful in managing heart failure patients in general, and as such questioned their use in the advanced heart failure population. At this point, the use of biomarker to identify patients with myocardial recovery during LVAD support has not been established, and LVAD explantation remains a decision driven by echocardiographic and hemodynamics improvement. HF biomarkers in monitoring myocardial and neurohormonal activation response to mechanical unloading and medical therapy could be valuable. However, at this time, there is inadequate evidence to select a single or a set of HF biomarkers to reliably identify patients bridged to recovery for LVAD explantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29971612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.