Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971522›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

The effect of a coix seed oil injection on cancer pain relief.

Peirong Zhang, Xiaoyan Meng, Xiaohua Tang, Li Ren, Jun Liang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Production ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peirong ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1, Life Science Park Road, Beijing, 102206, China.
Xiaoyan MengDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1, Life Science Park Road, Beijing, 102206, China.
Xiaohua TangDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1, Life Science Park Road, Beijing, 102206, China.
Li RenDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1, Life Science Park Road, Beijing, 102206, China.
Jun LiangDepartment of Oncology, Peking University International Hospital, No. 1, Life Science Park Road, Beijing, 102206, China. liangjunpku@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-0164
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in patients with advanced cancer, but is still less than optimally treated. The effect of traditional Chinese medicine in cancer pain treatment is nowadays getting more and more attention.

objectiveTo investigate the effect of a coix seed oil injection on cancer pain relief in a cancer center in a tertiary hospital in China.

methodsPatients in the treatment group received a coix seed oil injection for 2 weeks, while patients in the control group received equivalent 0.9% saline. The numeric rating scale was used to assess the pain level. The Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 was used to assess life quality. The adverse drug reactions during the treatment process were observed.

resultsPatients in the coix seed treatment group had significantly superior efficacy on pain control over those in the control group. Coix seed therapy significantly improved patients' scores reflecting by the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) scale. In addition, the occurrence of adverse reactions such as constipation and nausea in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group.

conclusionThe coix seed oil injection effectively reduced the pain level of cancer patients, significantly improved their life quality, and had no obvious adverse effects.

Indexed as

Cancer PainChinaCoixDrugs, Chinese HerbalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementQuality of LifeSeedsDrugs, Chinese HerbalCancer pain managementCoix seed oilNumeric rating scaleQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29971522
OpenAlexW2810496521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.