Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971464›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2018

Immunotherapy with cancer peptides in combination with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Wataru Obara, Isao Hara, Yoichiro Kato, Renpei Kato, Keiji Inoue, Fuminori Sato, Hiromitsu Mimata, Yusuke Nakamura, Tomoaki Fujioka

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Vaccine approaches to treat urothelial cancer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wataru ObaraDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan. watao@iwate-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-9640
Isao HaraDepartment of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Yoichiro KatoDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Renpei KatoDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Keiji InoueDepartment of Urology, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan.
Fuminori SatoDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Hiromitsu MimataDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Yusuke NakamuraSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tomoaki FujiokaDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, 19-1 Uchimaru, Morioka, 020-8505, Japan.
Iwate Medical University · JPOita University · JPUniversity of Chicago · USWakayama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA phase I study using two peptide vaccines derived from M phase phosphoprotein 1 (MPHOSPH1) and DEP domain containing 1 (DEPDC1) demonstrated promising results for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer. Therefore, we further tested the ability of these peptides to prevent recurrence after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND

methods127 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, non-randomized phase II clinical trial. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and secondary endpoints were safety and immunological response. HLA-A24-restricted peptides were subcutaneously administered in addition to intravesical BCG therapy. The exploratory endpoint evaluated differences of RFS rate between HLA-A*2402-positive (A24(+)) and -negative (A24(-)) groups.

resultsA 2-year RFS rate in all patients was 74.0%. The RFS rate in the A24(+) group (n = 75) and in the A24(-) group (n = 52) were 76.0 and 71.2%, respectively. This vaccine therapy was well-tolerated and feasible. MPHOSPH1 and DEPDC1 peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses were observed in 75.8 and 77.5% of the A24(+) group, respectively. Patients having both peptide-specific CTL responses showed significantly better RFS than patients without CTL response (P = 0.014). In the A24(+) group, patients who had positive reaction at the injection sites (RAI) had significantly lower rates of recurrence than RAI-negative patients (P = 0.0019).

conclusionsCancer peptide vaccines in combination with intravesical BCG therapy demonstrated good immunogenicity and safety, and may provide benefit for preventing recurrence of NMIBC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBCG VaccineCancer VaccinesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGTPase-Activating ProteinsHLA-A24 AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, ActiveKinesinsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsPeptide FragmentsBCG VaccineCancer VaccinesDEPDC1 protein, humanGTPase-Activating ProteinsHLA-A*24:02 antigenHLA-A24 AntigenKIF20B protein, humanKinesinsNeoplasm ProteinsPeptide FragmentsVaccines, SubunitAdjuvant therapyCancer peptide vaccineDEP domain containing 1M phase phosphoprotein 1Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID29971464
PMCPMC11028097
OpenAlexW2810600065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.