Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971462›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2018

Discrimination, Bullying and Harassment in Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Yeqian Huang, Terence C Chua, Robyn P M Saw, Christopher J Young

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Workplace bullying and sexual harassment among general surgery residents in ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Personal Perspective: Is Bullying Still a Problem in Medicine?Advances in medical education and practice · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence of gender-based and sexual harassment within orthopedic surgery in Canada.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yeqian HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia.
Terence C ChuaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Robyn P M SawDiscipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Christopher J YoungDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia. christopher.young@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015, the public media in Australia reported a series of life stories of victims who had been subjected to inappropriate behaviors in their surgical careers, bringing the profession into disrepute. Currently, limited data are available in the medical literature on discrimination, bullying and harassment (DBH) in surgery. This significant information gap prompted a systematic review to compile relevant information about DBH in surgical practice and training, in particular, its prevalence and impact.

methodsA literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases (May 1929-October 2017). Studies identified were appraised with standard selection criteria. Data points were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

resultsEight studies, comprising 5934 participants, were examined. Discrimination occurred in a pooled estimate of 22.4% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 14.0-33.9%]. One of the papers reported the prevalence of bullying using two methods including Revised Negative Acts Questionnaire and a definition by Einarsen. Pooled estimate of incidence rate was thus 37.7% (95% CI = 34.0-41.5%) and 40.3% (95% CI = 34.7-46.2%), respectively. In terms of harassment, pooled prevalence was 31.2% (95% CI = 10.0-65.0%).

conclusionsDBH is a significant issue in surgery. The true incidence of these issues may remain underestimated. Actions are being taken by professional bodies to create a positive culture in surgery. The effectiveness of these strategies is yet to be determined. More studies are warranted to investigate the magnitude of these issues given their psychological impact, and more importantly to monitor the effectiveness of current measures.

Indexed as

BullyingHumansIncidencePrejudicePrevalenceSpecialties, Surgical

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.