ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018
[Innovations in personalized medicine : Molecular characterization of liquid biopsy-fake or fact?]
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Inflection Point in Cancer Protein Biomarkers: What was and What's Next.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The molecular characterization of biomarkers will be fundamental for personalized medicine. New therapeutic targets have been identified in urological tumors (mainly in prostate cancer) and are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Tissue biopsies are associated with high costs, morbidity of the biopsy sample, and only allow analysis of a point-shaped part of the tumor. The liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are noninvasive ways to detect specific changes in the tumor. There are still a few challenges to overcome, e. g., the stability and origin of the CTCs and cfDNA. The detection methods are not yet standardized which makes quality management more difficult. The main applications of liquid biopsy have led to a boom in the field of molecular diagnostics, which does not always have to do with the extended understanding of the individual analytes, but much more on the better sensitivity of the technologies. Despite the tremendous progress made in recent years in the field of liquid biopsy, this has not led to clinical implementation. There is still a lack of validated treatment guidelines in which the results of liquid biopsies can be integrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29971453What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.