Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971453›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2018

[Innovations in personalized medicine : Molecular characterization of liquid biopsy-fake or fact?]

G Theil, P Fornara

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G TheilUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Nierentransplantationszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube Str. 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Deutschland. Gerit.Theil@uk-halle.de.
P FornaraUniversitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Nierentransplantationszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Ernst-Grube Str. 40, 06120, Halle/Saale, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular characterization of biomarkers will be fundamental for personalized medicine. New therapeutic targets have been identified in urological tumors (mainly in prostate cancer) and are currently being investigated in clinical trials. Tissue biopsies are associated with high costs, morbidity of the biopsy sample, and only allow analysis of a point-shaped part of the tumor. The liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are noninvasive ways to detect specific changes in the tumor. There are still a few challenges to overcome, e. g., the stability and origin of the CTCs and cfDNA. The detection methods are not yet standardized which makes quality management more difficult. The main applications of liquid biopsy have led to a boom in the field of molecular diagnostics, which does not always have to do with the extended understanding of the individual analytes, but much more on the better sensitivity of the technologies. Despite the tremendous progress made in recent years in the field of liquid biopsy, this has not led to clinical implementation. There is still a lack of validated treatment guidelines in which the results of liquid biopsies can be integrated.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPathology, MolecularProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersCirculating tumor cellPersonalizing therapyUrooncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.