ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2018
Comparing Clinical Perimetry and Population Receptive Field Measures in Patients with Choroideremia.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust and reproducible population receptive field mapping in patients with retinal pathologies.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cortical response to transient and long-term visual field loss.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Long term adult visual plasticity after the developmental critical period in genetically determinedHeliyon · 2025Article
- The Role of Population Receptive Field Sizes in Higher-Order Visual Dysfunction.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2024Review
- Central visual pathways affected by degenerative retinal disease before and after gene therapy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Achromatopsia-Visual Cortex Stability and Plasticity in the Absence of Functional Cones.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Comparison of Stimulus Types for Retinotopic Cortical Mapping of Macular Disease.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Highly accurate retinotopic maps of the physiological blind spot in human visual cortex.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Visual Field Reconstruction Using fMRI-Based Techniques.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Visual Field Reconstruction in Hemianopia Using fMRI Based Mapping Techniques.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Functional MRI of visual cortex predicts training-induced recovery in stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2021Article
- Mapping Visual Field Defects With fMRI - Impact of Approach and Experimental Conditions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Studying Cortical Plasticity in Ophthalmic and Neurological Disorders: From Stimulus-Driven to Cortical Circuitry Modeling Approaches.Neural plasticity · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Choroideremia (CHM) is an X-linked recessive form of hereditary retinal degeneration, which, at advanced stages, leaves only small central islands of preserved retinal tissue. Unlike many other retinal diseases, the spared tissue in CHM supports excellent central vision and stable fixation. Such spared topography in CHM presents an ideal platform to explore the relationship between preserved central retinal structure and the retinotopic organization of visual cortex by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Methods: fMRI was conducted in four participants with CHM and four healthy control participants while they viewed drifting contrast pattern stimuli monocularly. A single ∼3-minute fMRI run was collected for each eye separately. fMRI data were analyzed using the population receptive field (pRF) modeling approach. Participants also underwent ophthalmic evaluations of visual acuity and static automatic perimetry. Results: The spatial distribution and strength of pRF estimates correlated positively and significantly with clinical outcome measures in most participants with CHM. Importantly, the positive relationship between clinical and pRF measurements increased with increasing disease progression. A less consistent relationship was observed for control participants. Conclusions: Although reflecting only a small sample size, clinical evaluations of visual function in participants with CHM were well characterized by the spatial distribution and strength of pRF estimates by using a single ∼3-minute fMRI experiment. fMRI data analyzed with pRF modeling may be an efficient and objective outcome measure to complement current ophthalmic evaluations. Specifically, pRF modeling may be a feasible approach for evaluating the impact of interventions to restore visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.