Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971429›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2018

Association Between Preoperative Proteinuria and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Readmission.

Tyler S Wahl, Laura A Graham, Melanie S Morris, Joshua S Richman, Robert H Hollis, Caroline E Jones, Kamal M Itani, Todd H Wagner, Hillary J Mull, Jeffrey C Whittle and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Tyler S WahlBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Laura A GrahamBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Melanie S MorrisBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Joshua S RichmanBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Robert H HollisBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Caroline E JonesBirmingham and Tuscaloosa Health Services Research and Development Unit, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Kamal M ItaniCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Todd H WagnerVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.
Hillary J MullCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey C WhittleMilwaukee Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Gordon L TelfordMilwaukee Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Amy K RosenCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Laurel A CopelandVeterans Affairs Central Western Massachusetts Health Care System, Leeds.
Edith A BurnsMilwaukee Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Mary T HawnVeterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USBirmingham VA Medical Center · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USBoston University · USHarvard University · USMilwaukee VA Medical Center · USStanford University · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Central Western Massachusetts Healthcare System · USVA Palo Alto Health Care System · US

Funding

UAB Health Services Research (HSR) Training ProgramT32HS013852 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LEVITAN, EMILY B, MUGAVERO, MICHAEL J · 2003 to 2024
$8.0M
Research Training Program in Surgical OncologyT32CA091078 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI KENNEDY, GREGORY DEAN · 2002 to 2017
$4.8M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852NCI NIH HHS T32 CA091078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Proteinuria indicates renal dysfunction and is a risk factor for morbidity among medical patients, but less is understood among surgical populations. There is a paucity of studies investigating how preoperative proteinuria is associated with surgical outcomes, including postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and readmission. Objective: To assess preoperative urine protein levels as a biomarker for adverse surgical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective, population-based study was conducted in a cohort of patients with and without known preoperative renal dysfunction undergoing elective inpatient surgery performed at 119 Veterans Affairs facilities from October 1, 2007, to September 30, 2014. Data analysis was conducted from April 4 to December 1, 2016. Preoperative dialysis, septic, cardiac, ophthalmology, transplantation, and urologic cases were excluded. Exposures: Preoperative proteinuria as assessed by urinalysis using the closest value within 6 months of surgery: negative (0 mg/dL), trace (15-29 mg/dL), 1+ (30-100 mg/dL), 2+ (101-300 mg/dL), 3+ (301-1000 mg/dL), and 4+ (>1000 mg/dL). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was postoperative predischarge AKI and 30-day postdischarge unplanned readmission. Secondary outcomes included any 30-day postoperative outcome. Results: Of 346 676 surgeries, 153 767 met inclusion criteria, with the majority including orthopedic (37%), general (29%), and vascular procedures (14%). Evidence of proteinuria was shown in 43.8% of the population (trace: 20.6%, 1+: 16.0%, 2+: 5.5%, 3+: 1.6%) with 20.4%, 14.9%, 4.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, of the patients having a normal preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). In unadjusted analysis, preoperative proteinuria was significantly associated with postoperative AKI (negative: 8.6%, trace: 12%, 1+: 14.5%, 2+: 21.2%, 3+: 27.6%; P < .001) and readmission (9.3%, 11.3%, 13.3%, 15.8%, 17.5%, respectively, P < .001). After adjustment, preoperative proteinuria was associated with postoperative AKI in a dose-dependent relationship (trace: odds ratio [OR], 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3, to 3+: OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.8-2.2) and 30-day unplanned readmission (trace: OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1, to 3+: OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4). Preoperative proteinuria was associated with AKI independent of eGFR. Conclusions and Relevance: Proteinuria was associated with postoperative AKI and 30-day unplanned readmission independent of preoperative eGFR. Simple urine assessment for proteinuria may identify patients at higher risk of AKI and readmission to guide perioperative management.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodPrognosisProteinuriaRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID29971429
PMCPMC6233648
OpenAlexW2810347967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.