Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29971342›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

Forward and Backward Masking of Consonants in School-Age Children and Adults.

Heather L Porter, Emily R Spitzer, Emily Buss, Lori J Leibold, John H Grose

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather L PorterCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
Emily R SpitzerDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Emily BussOtolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Lori J LeiboldCenter for Hearing Research, Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, NE.
John H GroseOtolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

SUSCEPTIBILITY TO AND RELEASE FROM MASKING IN INFANCY AND CHILDHOODR01DC011038 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LEIBOLD, LORI J. · 2011 to 2020
$4.3M
Factors influencing the behavioral assessment of hearing during infancy and childhoodR01DC014460 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSS, EMILY · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Mechanisms of Auditory Temporal Processing MaturationF32DC014209 · NIDCD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI PORTER, HEATHER LYNN · 2014 to 2014
$57k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC014209NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011038NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This experiment sought to determine whether children's increased susceptibility to nonsimultaneous masking, particularly backward masking, is evident for speech stimuli. Method: Five- to 9-year-olds and adults with normal hearing heard nonsense consonant-vowel-consonant targets. In Experiments 1 and 2, those targets were presented between two 250-ms segments of 70-dB-SPL speech-shaped noise, at either -30 dB signal-to-noise ratio (Experiment 1) or at the listener's word recognition threshold (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, the target was presented in steady speech-shaped noise at listener threshold. For all experiments, percent correct was estimated for initial and final consonants. Results: In the nonsimultaneous noise conditions, child-adult differences were larger for the final consonant than the initial consonant whether listeners were tested at -30 dB signal-to-noise ratio (Experiment 1) or at their individual word recognition threshold (Experiment 2). Children were not particularly susceptible to backward masking relative to adults when tested in a steady masker (Experiment 3). Conclusions: Child-adult differences were greater for backward than forward masking for speech in a nonsimultaneous noise masker, as observed in previous psychophysical studies using tonal stimuli. Children's greater susceptibility to nonsimultaneous masking, and backward masking in particular, could play a role in their limited ability to benefit from masker envelope modulation when recognizing masked speech.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleNoiseSemanticsSignal-To-Noise RatioYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29971342
PMCPMC6195056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.