ArticleJournal of cardiovascular imaging2018
Cardiac and Pericardial
Article in Journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of cardiac tumors: Optimizing the treatment strategy for patients with intermural and pericardial cardiac tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography identifying pericardial metastasis from early-stage p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer.Clinical case reports · 2020Article
- Contribution and performance of multimodal imaging in the diagnosis and management of cardiac masses.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Article
- A right atrium metastasis of breast cancer after long-term endocrine therapy.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Focal mass-like cardiac uptake on oncologic FDG PET/CT: Real lesion or atypical pattern of physiologic uptake?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterpretation of cardiac uptake on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (
methodsWe enrolled 43 consecutive patients (34 solid tumors, 8 lymphomas and 1 leukemia) who were newly diagnosed with non-cardiac malignancy showing incidental cardiac or pericardial
resultsFifty-six
conclusionsCardiac or pericardial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.