ArticleBJPsych open2018
Shared decision-making with involuntary hospital patients: a qualitative study of barriers and facilitators.
Article in BJPsych open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.Community mental health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2021Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators of shared decision making in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia-Qualitative findings from the intervention group of a randomised-controlled trial.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS).Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2020Trial
- The Approach of Shared Decision-Making as a Factor in Improving the Quality of Care.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Triadic shared decision making in emergency psychiatry: an explorative study.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Clinical, legal and ethical implications of coercion and compulsory treatment in eating disorders: do rapid review findings identify clear answers or more muddy waters?Journal of eating disorders · 2024Review
- Ethical Issues in Clinical Decision-Making about Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Shared decision-making in post-coercion debriefing interventions in psychiatry - a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Meaning Analysis and Alienation: A Method of Immanent Critique in Acute Psychiatry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Review
- Article
- NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- 'Triadic' shared decision making in mental health: Experiences and expectations of service users, caregivers and clinicians in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- The role ofThe South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2021Article
- Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2020Review
- Shared decision making, aggression, and coercion in inpatients with schizophrenia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020Article
- Mental Health Patients' Expectations about the Non-Medical Care They Receive in Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Full Radiology Report through Patient Web Portal: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLast year, there were more than 63 622 involuntary admissions to psychiatric hospitals in England. One of the core principles stipulated in the code of practice for care under the Mental Health Act is involving involuntary patients in care decisions.
aimsIdentifying barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making with involuntary patients.
methodFocus groups and individual interviews with patients and clinicians who have experience with involuntary hospital treatment were carried out. Data were subjected to thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty-two patients and 16 clinicians participated. Barriers identified included challenges in communication, and noisy and busy wards making one-to-one meetings difficult. Patient involvement was identified as easier if initiated early after admission and if the whole clinical team was on board. Carers' presence helped decision-making through providing additional information and comfort.
conclusionsThe barriers and facilitators identified can inform changes in the practice of involuntary care to increase patient involvement. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.